Robert Haas writes:
> While I like having HP-UX buildfarm coverage, the status page says
> that gaur is running 10.20, which according to noted reliable source
> Wikipedia, was released in 1996 and went out of support in 2003. So I
> wonder whether testing that version is really a sensible thing t
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 2:16 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> There wasn't any amazingly good reason to be using -O1 for gaur,
> so I've switched the animal to use -O2. I expect it'll go back
> to green in a few hours.
While I like having HP-UX buildfarm coverage, the status page says
that gaur is running 10
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 3:16 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> I've concluded that this is probably a compiler bug. It doesn't fail
> at optimization level -O0 or -O2, only -O1; and trying to step through
> gen_partprune_steps_internal() suggests that the part_scheme local
> variable is changing value, which i
Etsuro Fujita writes:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 11:13 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sure looks that way, doesn't it? I'm just now working to reproduce
>> on gaur's host and poke into it with a debugger. More news in an
>> hour or two (it's slow :-().
> Thanks for that!
I've concluded that this is prob
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 11:13 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro writes:
> > Hi Fujita-san
> > I wonder if this build farm failure is related?
Thanks for letting me know!
> Sure looks that way, doesn't it? I'm just now working to reproduce
> on gaur's host and poke into it with a debugger. More
Thomas Munro writes:
> Hi Fujita-san
> I wonder if this build farm failure is related?
Sure looks that way, doesn't it? I'm just now working to reproduce
on gaur's host and poke into it with a debugger. More news in an
hour or two (it's slow :-().
regards, tom lane
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 2:01 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> src/backend/partitioning/partprune.c | 187 ++
Hi Fujita-san
I wonder if this build farm failure is related?
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
...
#0 0x59c15c in gen_partprune_steps_inte
Fix some issues with step generation in partition pruning.
In the case of range partitioning, get_steps_using_prefix() assumes that
the passed-in prefix list contains at least one clause for each of the
partition keys earlier than one specified in the passed-in
step_lastkeyno, but the caller (ie,
Fix some issues with step generation in partition pruning.
In the case of range partitioning, get_steps_using_prefix() assumes that
the passed-in prefix list contains at least one clause for each of the
partition keys earlier than one specified in the passed-in
step_lastkeyno, but the caller (ie,
Fix some issues with step generation in partition pruning.
In the case of range partitioning, get_steps_using_prefix() assumes that
the passed-in prefix list contains at least one clause for each of the
partition keys earlier than one specified in the passed-in
step_lastkeyno, but the caller (ie,
Fix some issues with step generation in partition pruning.
In the case of range partitioning, get_steps_using_prefix() assumes that
the passed-in prefix list contains at least one clause for each of the
partition keys earlier than one specified in the passed-in
step_lastkeyno, but the caller (ie,
11 matches
Mail list logo
