eviously, we agreed that P_IGNORE() is required. So I assume no issues
there. The other tests seem required too for us to conclusively decide to
use the cached block.
>
> I also noticed that favorable/favourable is misspelled "favourble".
> Also, "workout" is a noun.
>
Fixed in the attached delta.
Please have a look.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
pg_btree_target_block_v4_delta.patch
Description: Binary data
patch to fix whatever I could spot before the patch
was reverted. I see Andres has already started discussion about displaying
memory usage which was one other thing I'd spotted while the build farm was
red.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
s false
if page split is needed? But isn't page split is only needed if the page
doesn't have enough free space? If so, we have checked for that before
setting "fastpath".
> * The indentation of the main _bt_doinsert() test does not follow
> project guidelines. Please t
f your review comments), but got side tracked by some high priority
customer escalation. I shall respond soon.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-04-05 00:02:06 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> > Apologies from my end. Simon checked with me regarding your referenced
> > email. I was in the middle of responding to it (with a add-on patch to
> take
#x27;s cached
> page also being detected as invalidated, but only when we happen to
> recycle a page that once again becomes the rightmost leaf page.
>
>
Can I borrow that almost verbatim, after adding details about the
optimisation itself? Looks like I'm too tired to think sensibly.
> Once those changes are made, this should be fine to commit.
>
Ok, thanks.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
age". That is what
> we check here, not "greater than or equal".
>
>
This was part of the follow-on patch that I'd sent (which needs a little
more adjustments based on Peter's feedback). But thanks for taking care of
it anyways.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
e would be many other things that will break and require changes, no?
Apart from that, other changes requested are included in the patch. This
also takes care of Heikki's observation regarding UNLOGGED tables on the
other thread.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee htt