On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> > It might seem a minor quibble, but it seems like a more reliable approach
> > might be to cast to a 64 bit type and user a 64 bit int formatter.
> %ld ? %lld? depending on architecture?
>
> >
> > It seems unlikely that state->ptr - state->begin would y
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> Log Message:
> ---
> Fix compiler warnings on 64-bit boxes: difference between
> pointers are int64, but warnings are emitted for position info in
> error messages in parser, so, just cast it to int32
>
> Modified Files:
> --
> pgs
Yes
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Robert Treat wrote:
> I think I missed this in the earlier patches, but does the alter table syntax
> still work for indexes in addition to the new syntax?
>
> On Saturday 21 August 2004 22:47, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> > Here is a change to the alter_tab
wrote:
> Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Thanks for spotting this sloppy work. Basically, I cropped my diff because
> > there was lots of unrelated code in the work space. But I was a little too
> > hard and culled allfiles.sgml, alter.c, equal/copyfuncs.c and a
Umm... oops.
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > Add ALTER INDEX, particularly for moving tablespaces.
>
> This patch is a perfect example of why unreviewed patches should not
> go in during beta.
>
> So far I have noticed the following problems wi
