On 05/15/2015 07:44 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 05/15/2015 06:04 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 15 May 2015 at 04:59, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The difference there was that that was specifically adding a new
feature
of value to FDWs. This is just
On 18 May 2015 at 10:53, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
What is the current state of this? Are we sticking with what Tom
classified as drive-by breakage?
Since I was the one complaining, I'm willing to do the legwork to
insert a compatibility
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 05/15/2015 06:04 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 15 May 2015 at 04:59, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The difference there was that that was specifically adding a new
feature
On 15 May 2015 at 04:59, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The difference there was that that was specifically adding a new feature
of value to FDWs. This is just drive-by breakage.
I think that comment is reasonable. I will continue with my commits of
tablesample, then return to see if we
On 05/15/2015 06:04 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 15 May 2015 at 04:59, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The difference there was that that was specifically adding a new
feature
of value to FDWs. This is just drive-by breakage.
I think that comment is
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Separate block sampling functions
This patch broke buildfarm member crake.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 15 May 2015 at 03:50, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Separate block sampling functions
This patch broke buildfarm
On 15 May 2015 at 03:50, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Separate block sampling functions
This patch broke buildfarm member crake.
OK, thanks. I missed that amongst the other unrelated failures. Looking
now.
--
Simon Riggs
On 15 May 2015 at 04:06, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 15 May 2015 at 03:50, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Separate block sampling functions
Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
TBH, I think that this patch itself was a bad idea and should be reverted.
I don't object to changing APIs used by external modules when there's a
good reason to break them,
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 15 May 2015 at 03:50, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Separate block sampling functions
This patch broke buildfarm member crake.
OK, thanks. I missed that amongst
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 15 May 2015 at 04:06, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 15 May 2015 at 03:50, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 15 May 2015 at 03:50, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com
13 matches
Mail list logo
