On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:33 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm inclined to propose adding an example a little further down, as
> per the attached draft patch. This wouldn't help people who stop
> reading after the section's first sentence, but we can't cover
> everything in the first sentence.
>
>
Given
Thanks for the quick resolution.
Best,
Federico
Ps: sorry for the previous messages in html, I had not realized that the
client I was using were sending the replies like that.
On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 17:28, Tom Lane wrote:
> Laurenz Albe writes:
> > On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 19:18 -0400, Tom Lane w
Laurenz Albe writes:
> On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 19:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So what I was remembering was some text in the section about sequence
>> functions. That probably seemed appropriate when they were the only
>> real use of regclass; but these days we have regclass-accepting functions
>>
On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 13:48 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
> We should add a line that indicates that there is a limitation (that
> should be IMO, backported to documentation of earlier versions as it
> affects all supported versions), at least until such limitation is
> lifted.
Here is a patch for
On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 13:24 +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 14:26 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createtrigger.html mentions the
> > word "transaction" only once, in reference specifically to constraint
> > triggers: "They can b
The patch is also clear for me, thanks for working on it. Best,Federico From: Laurenz AlbeSent: mercoledì 5 maggio 2021 09:32To: Tom Lane; FedericoCc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.orgSubject: Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error On Tue, 2021-05-04 at
On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 19:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> [ redirecting to pgsql-docs list ]
>
> I wrote:
> > Federico writes:
> > > I did not come across that documented behavior while searching for
> > > regclass
> > > in the pg docs. The most relevant page I was able to find was the Object
> > > I
