Alvaro Herrera writes:
> On 2021-Jun-01, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +1 for the concept, but I feel that "live in" is a bit too informal
>> for this context. I'm too caffeine-deprived to instantly come up
>> with le mot juste; but perhaps "exist within" would be an improvement?
> The glossary uses "resid
On 2021-Jun-01, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > ... I wonder if it would be more practical to just write:
>
> > The name of the object to be commented. Names of objects that live
> > in schemas (tables, functions, etc.) can be schema-qualified.
>
> +1 for the concept,
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> ... I wonder if it would be more practical to just write:
> The name of the object to be commented. Names of objects that live
> in schemas (tables, functions, etc.) can be schema-qualified.
+1 for the concept, but I feel that "live in" is a bit too informa
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/pgprewarm.html
Description:
To be added to the documentation:
- Default location of autoprewarm.blocks
- Configure the location of autoprewarm.blocks
- How often does it dump the block id
