Re: Pushing btree opclass implementor's docs to the main SGML docs

Peter Eisentraut writes: > On 2/5/18 18:51, Tom Lane wrote: >> So I can see two ways to approach this: add two new subsections at the end >> of xindex.sgml, or create a new chapter about b-trees in Part VII >> ("Internals") to go beside the existing ones about

Re: Pushing btree opclass implementor's docs to the main SGML docs

On 2/5/18 18:51, Tom Lane wrote: > So I can see two ways to approach this: add two new subsections at the end > of xindex.sgml, or create a new chapter about b-trees in Part VII > ("Internals") to go beside the existing ones about the more recently added > index types. The latter would make more