Re: Improve documentation for pg_upgrade, standbys and rsync

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:11 PM Stephen Frost wrote: > * Laurenz Albe (laurenz.a...@cybertec.at) wrote: > > Thanks for looking at this! > > Sure. Thanks for working on it! Stephen, do you intend to do something about this patch in terms of getting it committed? You're the only reviewer but

Re: Improve documentation for pg_upgrade, standbys and rsync

Greetings, * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:11 PM Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Laurenz Albe (laurenz.a...@cybertec.at) wrote: > > > Thanks for looking at this! > > > > Sure. Thanks for working on it! > > Stephen, do you intend to do something about this

Re: Improve documentation for pg_upgrade, standbys and rsync

On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 01:10:38PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > To be more explicit though- we should write a tool to do this. We > shouldn't try to document a way to do it because it's hard to get right. > While rsync is very capable, what's needed to really do this goes beyond > what we could

stxkind only explain two elements. left two unexplained.

PostgreSQL: Documentation: 10: 51.51. pg_statistic_ext > stxkind : An array containing codes for the enabled statistics kinds; > valid values are: d for n-distinct statistics, f for functional > dependency statistics select

Re: stxkind only explain two elements. left two unexplained.

On Tuesday, April 5, 2022, Jian He wrote: > PostgreSQL: Documentation: 10: 51.51. pg_statistic_ext > > >> stxkind : An array containing codes for the enabled statistics kinds; >> valid values are: d for n-distinct statistics, f