Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2007-26-04 at 18:07 -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
>> (1) I believe the reasoning for Tom's earlier change was not to reduce
>> the I/O between the backend and the pgstat process [...]
> Tom, any comments on this? Your change introduced an undocumented
Jim Nasby wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats
> > functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical.
> >
> > Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring
> > section, but sho
On Apr 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats
functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical.
Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring
section, but shouldn't they actually be documented i
