Scott Marlowe writes:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Pre-7.1 might indeed be old enough to cut, but how much are we really
>> saving? Four sentences out of our current docs doesn't excite me ...
> But since there's a doc set per version, it would make sense to stop
> men
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira writes:
>> Bruce Momjian escreveu:
>>> Do people feel we should continue documenting that Postgres pre-7.1
>>> didn't reference child tables by default?
>>>
>> No. IMHO we should remove references to unsupported release
