"Kevin Grittner" writes:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> Yeah, I think that covers it well. :)
> I found a typo. :-( Another revision attached.
Applied to HEAD and 9.0, with a couple of trivial editorial adjustments.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pg
Thom Brown wrote:
> Yeah, I think that covers it well. :)
I found a typo. :-( Another revision attached.
-Kevin
*** a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
***
*** 550,555 CREATE TABLE products (
--- 550,560
+ Adding a unique constraint
On 26 August 2010 20:16, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>
>> Looks good. Do we usually got into fine details such as the name
>> of the index? They'll see the index name returned when they
>> create the table or add the constraint anyway, and if they missed
>> it they only need to do
Thom Brown wrote:
> Looks good. Do we usually got into fine details such as the name
> of the index? They'll see the index name returned when they
> create the table or add the constraint anyway, and if they missed
> it they only need to do a "\dt tablename" to find out what it was.
Hmmm...
On 26 August 2010 18:50, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>
>>> It looks like discussion died here. Do you want to propose a new
>>> patch? (I'd be happy to give it a shot if you'd rather.)
>>
>> Sure, go for it. :)
>
> Initial stab at it attached.
>
> I'm tor
Thom Brown wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> It looks like discussion died here. Do you want to propose a new
>> patch? (I'd be happy to give it a shot if you'd rather.)
>
> Sure, go for it. :)
Initial stab at it attached.
I'm torn on whether the paragraph I added to the foreign key
cons
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 18:27 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> I agree with this too and I'll work on making sure things look more
> consistent. I'll just have to think about how to make the differences
> clear without random splashes of colour on the page.
blues and greys are going to be easier on the
Thom Brown wrote:
> > Thom - there you go, now it's public, there's no backing down now :P
> >
>
> Looks like the webkit rendering engine can't deal with rounded corners
> neatly where the borders are different widths so got rid of the
> left-hand border-width.
>
> Did a little bit more today:
>
On 26 August 2010 18:23, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>> It is great for it to be aesthetically pleasing but if we have
>>> those minor inconsistencies I think it would be distracting from
>>> the information itself.
>>
>> Agreed, and it's sort of experi
Thom Brown wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> It is great for it to be aesthetically pleasing but if we have
>> those minor inconsistencies I think it would be distracting from
>> the information itself.
>
> Agreed, and it's sort of experimental at the moment. If it
> doesn't help present inf
On 26 August 2010 18:00, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 17:28 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>
>>
>> Looks like the webkit rendering engine can't deal with rounded corners
>> neatly where the borders are different widths so got rid of the
>> left-hand border-width.
>
> did you use --webk
On 26 August 2010 18:03, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:03 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>
>> > Yeah, quite impressive. Would love to know how Thom did that. And if I
>> > can borrow it for the french translation of the manual :)
>>
>> Thanks, although I'm worried it's a bit too dist
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:03 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> > Yeah, quite impressive. Would love to know how Thom did that. And if I
> > can borrow it for the french translation of the manual :)
>
> Thanks, although I'm worried it's a bit too distracting. I got a bit
> carried away as originally it w
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 17:28 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>
> Looks like the webkit rendering engine can't deal with rounded corners
> neatly where the borders are different widths so got rid of the
> left-hand border-width.
did you use --webkit-border-radius
>
> Did a little bit more today:
> htt
On 26 August 2010 13:11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:03, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 26 August 2010 06:52, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>>> Le 26/08/2010 01:29, Joshua D. Drake a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 17:51 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:03, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 26 August 2010 06:52, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> Le 26/08/2010 01:29, Joshua D. Drake a écrit :
>>> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 17:51 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Thom Brown wrote:
> And another prototype:
> http://www.flickr.com
On 26 August 2010 06:52, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Le 26/08/2010 01:29, Joshua D. Drake a écrit :
>> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 17:51 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>> Thom Brown wrote:
>>>
And another prototype:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dark_ixion/4927669444/sizes/o/
>>>
>>> Wow! That
17 matches
Mail list logo
