Thom Brown writes:
> Do references to the CVS need removing now that everything is on GIT?
The chapter about CVS obviously needs to be replaced. I was talking
to Magnus about that earlier, and we both felt that that needs to be
back-patched, if only so that there are non-obsolete repository URLs
Do references to the CVS need removing now that everything is on GIT?
Is the CVS page still relevant?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/anoncvs.html (cvs.sgml)
This refers to that page and the anoncvs web interface:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/release.html (release.sgml)
The
Excerpts from Dmitriy Igrishin's message of lun sep 20 15:52:43 -0400 2010:
> Hey Bruce,
>
> Its interesting indeed, because I always wanted to know why libpq
> named "libpq". Thanks!
> But I wrote not about libpq functions, I just wanted to say about
> unnecessary (IMO) redundancy - the combinati
