Do references to the CVS need removing now that everything is on GIT? Is the CVS page still relevant? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/anoncvs.html (cvs.sgml) This refers to that page and the anoncvs web interface: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/release.html (release.sgml) The installation page talks about building from a CVS tree: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/install-requirements.html (installation.sgml) HOT (Heap-Only Typles) in acronyms (acronyms.sgml) links to anoncvs, so maybe point it to http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=blob_plain;f=src/backend/access/heap/README.HOT;hb=HEAD NLS info for translators refers to CVS: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/nls-translator.html (nls.sgml) Bug reporting mentions CVS: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/bug-reporting.html (problems.sgml)
-- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
