On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 07:42:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:35:06PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> It has been pointed out a while ago that the "release date" formatting
> >> in the release notes is too flamboyant, more so under the new sty
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:35:06PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> It has been pointed out a while ago that the "release date" formatting
>> in the release notes is too flamboyant, more so under the new stylesheets.
>>
>> Here is a patch to make the formatting a bit more
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:35:06PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> It has been pointed out a while ago that the "release date" formatting
> in the release notes is too flamboyant, more so under the new stylesheets.
>
> Here is a patch to make the formatting a bit more subdued. (Obviously,
> this
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> doc/src/sgml/sql.sgml hasn't been built as part of the docs since
> forever, and it just trips me up on any greps for global changes. Can
> we remove it?
Looking at the git logs shows that we've spent effort on maintaining it,
which is a bit silly if it's unused. We s
doc/src/sgml/sql.sgml hasn't been built as part of the docs since
forever, and it just trips me up on any greps for global changes. Can
we remove it?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 08:23:03PM +, john.christofola...@gmail.com wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/ddl-partitioning.html
> Description:
>
> Section 5.9.6 of the documentation discusses caveats r
