tgooda...@gmail.com wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/runtime-config-query.html
> Description:
>
> "Better ways to improve the quality of the plans chosen by the optimizer
> include adjusting the plane
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/runtime-config-query.html
Description:
"Better ways to improve the quality of the plans chosen by the optimizer
include adjusting the planer cost constants"
The word planner is mi
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:49:04AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> There's a minor grammatical typo in the description of leakproof
> functions (going back to 9.2).
> Patch attached.
Patch applied and backpatched to 9.5 --- thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB
There's a minor grammatical typo in the description of leakproof
functions (going back to 9.2).
Patch attached.
Regards,
Dean
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/rules.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/rules.sgml
new file mode 100644
index cb5c8fc..720f976
--- a/doc/src/sgml/rules.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/rules.sgml
@@ -2
On 08.04.2012 03:29, Basil Bourque wrote:
[1] Is this mailing list the proper place to report minor problems such as
typos found in the documentation?
Yes.
[2] I found the breakout of parameters on this page:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-createdatabase.html
…listed “u
[1] Is this mailing list the proper place to report minor problems such as
typos found in the documentation?
[2] I found the breakout of parameters on this page:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-createdatabase.html
…listed “usename” rather than “username”, missing the ‘r’.
—B
On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 02:41, Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> Well, here's a patch for select.sgml should a committer ever feel
> inspired:
Patch applied -- thanks.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
Well, here's a patch for select.sgml should a committer ever feel
inspired:
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
the default behavior. (In releases before 7.1,
ONLY was the default behavior.) The default
behavior can be modified by changing the
-sql_interitance configuration o
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Friday 10 September 2004 04:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Neil Conway wrote:
> > > Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> > > > There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in
> > > > the 7.4.x docs:
> > >
> > > Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usual
On Friday 10 September 2004 04:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> > > There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the
> > > 7.4.x docs:
> >
> > Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't
> > bother applying docum
Neil Conway wrote:
> Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> > There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the
> > 7.4.x docs:
>
> Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't
> bother applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if
> there were plans for anothe
Tom Lane wrote:
There are a lot of typos besides this one, and always have been.
Personally I'd rather spend the time proofing current docs.
Also, there's been a tendency in the past to not regenerate the online
docs for each point release in a stable branch (particularly for formats
like PS and
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:31:09AM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
>> Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't bother
>> applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if there were
>> plans for another 7.4.x release.
> Oh, i
I second Alvaro: Why is that?
-tfo
On Sep 9, 2004, at 6:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:31:09AM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the
7.4.x
docs:
Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine --
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:31:09AM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
> Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> >There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the 7.4.x
> >docs:
>
> Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't bother
> applying documentation fixes to release bran
Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the 7.4.x
docs:
Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't bother
applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if there were
plans for another 7.4.x release.
-Neil
--
There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the 7.4.x docs:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/sql-select.html
I don't know whether their will be anything beyond 7.4.5, but this would be an easy patch.
-tfo
17 matches
Mail list logo