Re: [DOCS] docs correction (8.0 beta)

2004-08-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > John DeSoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > From the example below and looking at scan.c, it seems that nested > > block comments are supported. > > You are confusing SQL and PL/pgSQL. Any idea why they don't match between SQL and PL/pgSQL. -- Bruce Momjian

Re: [DOCS] docs correction (8.0 beta)

2004-08-25 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> You are confusing SQL and PL/pgSQL. > Any idea why they don't match between SQL and PL/pgSQL. Different lexers. We could talk about extending plpgsql's lexer to handle comments the same way as the main SQL lexer, but it doesn't do so

Re: [DOCS] docs correction (8.0 beta)

2004-08-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> You are confusing SQL and PL/pgSQL. > > > Any idea why they don't match between SQL and PL/pgSQL. > > Different lexers. > > We could talk about extending plpgsql's lexer to handle comments the > same way as the