Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Actually I was wondering if we should use actual words. So instead of
> > "foo" we could use "elephant" for asciiword and "Éléphant" (french) for
> > word. And for the hword, "sous-espèces" (which appears on the French
> > Wikipedia
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The hword_asciipart I'm not 100% sure about. I used this:
> militar in the context político-militar, or postgresql in the
> context postgresql-beta1
Hmm ... I went and looked at the page on developer.postgresql.org,
and it's just as I feare
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The hword_asciipart I'm not 100% sure about. I used this:
> > militar in the context pol�tico-militar, or postgresql in the
> > context postgresql-beta1
>
> Hmm ... I went and looked at the page on developer.postgresql.org,
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > The hword_asciipart I'm not 100% sure about. I used this:
> > > militar in the context pol?tico-militar, or postgresql in the
> > > context postgresql-beta1
> >
> > Hmm ... I went and looked at the pa
Am Donnerstag, 25. Oktober 2007 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Hmm ... I went and looked at the page on developer.postgresql.org,
> and it's just as I feared: with slightly bleary morning eyes, the
> accents over the i's are not obvious, and so you have to look *real*
> close before you get the point of the e
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 25. Oktober 2007 schrieb Tom Lane:
> > Hmm ... I went and looked at the page on developer.postgresql.org,
> > and it's just as I feared: with slightly bleary morning eyes, the
> > accents over the i's are not obvious, and so you have to look *real*
> > close
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, 25. Oktober 2007 schrieb Tom Lane:
>>> Hmm ... I went and looked at the page on developer.postgresql.org,
>>> and it's just as I feared: with slightly bleary morning eyes, the
>>> accents over the i's are not obv
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How about "lógico-matemática"?
Works for me.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
[ BCC to docs because this might affect documentation too.]
You probably remember the discussion about promoting the use of the
alias "Postgres" in addition to the official name "PostgreSQL". I have
changed the FAQ so that in paragraphs with multiple references to
"PostgreSQL" we also use the ali
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> So, for the FAQ, which currently uses the second-entry-per-paragraph
> logic, should it be changed to the logic suggested above where every
> mention but the first is "Postgres"? (This will of course affect the
> documentation changes when we are ready to discuss those.)
Ju
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 21:44 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > So, for the FAQ, which currently uses the second-entry-per-paragraph
> > logic, should it be changed to the logic suggested above where every
> > mention but the first is "Postgres"? (This will of course affect
>
Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 21:44 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > So, for the FAQ, which currently uses the second-entry-per-paragraph
> > > logic, should it be changed to the logic suggested above where every
> > > ment
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:10:31 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Just undo the whole thing. The project name is what it is.
> >
> > +1.
>
> Let's not get sidetracked here. There was already agreement in
> advocacy to promote the use of the alias, and this thread is to
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 16:10 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> There was already agreement in advocacy to promote the use of the
> alias,
Really?
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:10:31 -0400 (EDT)
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > > Just undo the whole thing. The project name is what it is.
> > >
> > > +1.
> >
> > Let's not get sidetracked here. There was already agreem
Hi Bruce,
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 16:50 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have the email addresses and opinions of a majority of advocacy
> posters. I can post it again if you want or we can go through this
> all again, probably with the same result.
So you say -advocacy list members are the ones wh
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:50:34 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Woah, let's be very clear here. There was zero agreement to promote
> > the name postgres. There was agreement to state that Postgres was an
> > acceptable form of the word PostgreSQL.
> >
> > Which I do still
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > Woah, let's be very clear here. There was zero agreement to promote
> > > the name postgres. There was agreement to state that Postgres was an
> > > acceptable form of the word PostgreSQL.
> > >
> > > Which I do still agree with, but that is far from "promoting".
> >
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Let's not get sidetracked here. There was already agreement in
> advocacy to promote the use of the alias, and this thread is to
> discuss that, not to revisit whether we should use an alias or not.
Advocacy opinions have no bearing on proper documentation writing. Nor
do
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Let's not get sidetracked here. ?There was already agreement in
> > advocacy to promote the use of the alias, and this thread is to
> > discuss that, not to revisit whether we should use an alias or not.
>
> Advocacy opinions have no bearing on pr
Seems we never had an example in the documentation of plpgsql RETURN
NEXT. I got a submission from Ulrich Kroener and have applied it,
attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If yo
21 matches
Mail list logo
