Hello.
You wrote:
BM> char101 wrote:
>>
>>
>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> >
>> > On 12/02/2010 02:56 AM, tji...@rijpma.org wrote:
>> >> On the webpage http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/ you can download
>> >> a windows help file (postgresql-8.4.chm). This option is missing for the
>> >> new post
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>
> > I've attached a couple minor fixes to the docs. One relating to
> > SECURITY LABEL and the other for pg_class.relpersistence
>
> relpersistence should be "char", not char.
> Oddly enough, there is a difference.
I am unsure on that one. We have
Peter, any status on this?
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Chris Meller wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Feb 4, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter, any news on this?
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2011-01-28 at 12:11 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > In my build, the entire contrib manual is potentially interdependent,
> > because the sub-sections of Appendix F d
Thom Brown wrote:
> It's been pointed out that on the pl/pgsql control structures page
> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/plpgsql-control-structures.html)
> there's an example using a cs_log function, which doesn't exist. I'm
> assuming this is supposed to be an example of a custom
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> What did we ever do with this idea?
Nobody felt like putting in the amount of work required to hammer out
the details, I think.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql
On 11 March 2011 13:48, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> It's been pointed out that on the pl/pgsql control structures page
>> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/plpgsql-control-structures.html)
>> there's an example using a cs_log function, which doesn't exist. I'm
>> ass
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Dmitriy Igrishin's message of dom feb 20 06:19:19 -0300 2011:
>
> > Better, undoubtedly.
> > Another alternative is just "server". Why? Well, for consistency, e.g. with
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/errcodes-appendix.html
> > Here you may see p
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 11 11:42:58 -0300 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Excerpts from Dmitriy Igrishin's message of dom feb 20 06:19:19 -0300 2011:
> >
> > > Better, undoubtedly.
> > > Another alternative is just "server". Why? Well, for consistency, e.g.
> > > with
>
2011/3/11 Alvaro Herrera
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 11 11:42:58 -0300 2011:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Excerpts from Dmitriy Igrishin's message of dom feb 20 06:19:19 -0300
> 2011:
> > >
> > > > Better, undoubtedly.
> > > > Another alternative is just "server". Why? W
2011/3/11 Dmitriy Igrishin
>
>
> 2011/3/11 Alvaro Herrera
>
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 11 11:42:58 -0300 2011:
>> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> > > Excerpts from Dmitriy Igrishin's message of dom feb 20 06:19:19 -0300
>> 2011:
>> > >
>> > > > Better, undoubtedly.
>> > > > An
Thom Brown wrote:
> Attached is a minor patch which changes the following:
>
> Adds index entries for session_user and pg_describe_object
> Removes extraneous closing parenthesis from pg_describe_object
> Puts pg_describe_object and has_sequence_privilege in correct
> alphabetical position in func
On 11 March 2011 15:24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> Attached is a minor patch which changes the following:
>>
>> Adds index entries for session_user and pg_describe_object
>> Removes extraneous closing parenthesis from pg_describe_object
>> Puts pg_describe_object and has_sequence_
I am unclear where to put this as well so I suggest we just put it in
catalogs.sgml and be done with it.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Kupershmidt writes:
> > The six different kinds of contexts in the pg_settings system view
I have added documentation for EXTRACT(DAY) usage with intervals. We
had something for MONTH, but for some reason nothing for DAY. Applied
patch attached.
---
Daniel Grace wrote:
> (Note: I'm not subscribed to pgsql-docs,
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > On 3/2/11 8:35 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>> Had to look up some stuff given the splintering of Solaris:
> >>>
> >>> ==
> >>>
> >>> Solaris 2.6 to 2.9
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I am unclear where to put this as well so I suggest we just put it in
> catalogs.sgml and be done with it.
>
Please propose a specific patch so we can complain about it. :-)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I am unclear where to put this as well so I suggest we just put it in
> > catalogs.sgml and be done with it.
> >
>
> Please propose a specific patch so we can complain about it. :-)
I am proposing Tom's:
I have applied the attached patch to document FreeBSD drive write cache
control.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/wal
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> Please propose a specific patch so we can complain about it. :-)
> I am proposing Tom's:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-12/msg3.php
It still seems like that material doesn't belong there. However, it's
largely a restatem
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Please propose a specific patch so we can complain about it. :-)
>
>> I am proposing Tom's:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-12/msg3.php
That's actually a link to Josh'
In docs, rename "backwards compatibility" to "backward compatibility"
for consistency. Applied patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
diff --git a/doc/src/s
On fre, 2011-03-11 at 08:41 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter, any news on this?
I wasn't planning to work on it.
>
> ---
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On fre, 2011-01-28 at 12:11 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > In my buil
23 matches
Mail list logo
