Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > On l??r, 2011-03-12 at 09:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> OK, it is not something worthwhile, or just something you don't have
> >> time for. If the later, can you give us a hint on how to fix it?
>
> > I'm not even sure what the actual action i
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar abr 26 12:15:50 -0300 2011:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > > On lr, 2011-03-12 at 09:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> OK, it is not something worthwhile, or just something you don't have
> > >> time for. If the later, can you g
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar abr 26 12:15:50 -0300 2011:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > > > On lr, 2011-03-12 at 09:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >> OK, it is not something worthwhile, or just something you don't have
> > > >>
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar abr 26 12:44:39 -0300 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Also, most of the sections are pretty short. Making each of them a
> > chapter seems a waste. I think some of them deserve a full chapter
> > (dblink, citext?, hstore, intarray, ltree, pgbench, p
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar abr 26 12:44:39 -0300 2011:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > > Also, most of the sections are pretty short. Making each of them a
> > > chapter seems a waste. I think some of them deserve a full chapter
> > > (dblink, citext?, h
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar abr 26 12:44:39 -0300 2011:
>>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Would it work to move only some?
>>> I think moving some would be even worse than what we have now, unless
>>> you can propose some logic about
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar abr 26 12:44:39 -0300 2011:
> >>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Would it work to move only some?
>
> >>> I think moving some would be even worse than what we have now, unless
> >>> y
Bruce Momjian writes:
> What do you think about moving the release notes up a bit, so we have a
> 8.1 release notes, 8.2 release notes, and all the subreleases are under
> that section? Not sure I like that but I am throwing out the idea.
Haven't heard any particular demand to make the release n
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:52 AM, wrote:
> Thank you again Josh.
> Could it be possible to fix the build procedure accordingly? Just to avoid
> that i hassle you all again for the next release...
> Do you need that i open a bug for that?
Devrim, or anyone else running the website, any chance of g