Hi, David!
Thanks for the explanation!
Now I clearly understand how it works.
I still think it would be great if this doc point was worded a little
differently in new editions.
Thank you!
On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 02:03, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 3:56 PM PG Doc comments
David, I have some suggestions.
but first i want to show how the current version of doc may look like for
new readers. and why.
I am sure that it looks pretty logical if you KNOW how it works, but it is
not so clear if you WANT to learn that from documentation.
explanation:
first sentence: "they
On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 16:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Laurenz Albe writes:
> > On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 13:24 +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 14:26 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > > > If I understand correctly, it would be helpful to add this sentence or a
> > > > correct
On Mon, 2021-07-26 at 15:11 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > > > An additional thing that we should really be mentioning is to tell
> > > > > people to go in and TRUNCATE all of their UNLOGGED tables before going
> > > > > through this process, otherwise the rsync will end up spending a bunch
> >
On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 11:54:11AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/ecpg-variables.html
> Description:
>
> Without this line:
> EXEC SQL WHENEVER NOT FOUND CONTINUE;
> after the wh
