On 8/7/17 17:46, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 8/1/17 13:33, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2017-07-31 21:13:48 +, sabrina.iq...@target.com wrote:
>>> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>>>
>>> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/release-9-6.html
>>>
On 8/1/17 13:33, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-07-31 21:13:48 +, sabrina.iq...@target.com wrote:
>> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>>
>> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/release-9-6.html
>> Description:
>>
>> Wondering why PostgreSQL still
On 01.08.2017 21:41, Simon Riggs wrote:
Do you think primary/secondary is more descriptive?
I started using the terms Primary and Secondary in the original use,
but I think we've moved away from that towards Master/Standby, which
fits better with a world where "muti-master" is a frequently
On 1 August 2017 at 09:13, wrote:
> Wondering why PostgreSQL still uses the terms master and slave when there
> are other terms like primary/secondary that can be used in the same manner.
Another alternative I've seen in different fields is "manager" and "agent".
--
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> Alvaro, all,
>
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> On 31 July 2017 at 22:13, wrote:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the
Alvaro, all,
* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On 31 July 2017 at 22:13, wrote:
> > > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> > >
> > > Page:
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 31 July 2017 at 22:13, wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/release-9-6.html
> > Description:
> >
> > Wondering why PostgreSQL still uses the terms
On 08/01/2017 12:41 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 31 July 2017 at 22:13, wrote:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/release-9-6.html
Description:
Wondering why PostgreSQL still uses the
On 31 July 2017 at 22:13, wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/release-9-6.html
> Description:
>
> Wondering why PostgreSQL still uses the terms master and slave when there
>
Hi,
On 2017-07-31 21:13:48 +, sabrina.iq...@target.com wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/release-9-6.html
> Description:
>
> Wondering why PostgreSQL still uses the terms master and slave when
10 matches
Mail list logo