Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:07 PM, David Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I imagine you can get round the second one by building your software
> so it supports PostgreSQL as well - that way you don't 'require
> customes to install MySQL'.
>
Well, I'm not sure how they'd e
"Kynn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Initially I didn't know what our max_locks_per_transaction was (nor even a
> typical value for it), but in light of the procedure's failure after 3500
> iterations, I figured that it was 3500 or so. In fact ours is only 64 (the
> default), so I'm now thor
2008/3/14, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Clodoaldo escribió:
>
> > 2008/3/14, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > > A quick look into pg_locks should tell you if it's blocking.
> >
> > pg_prepared_xacts is empty and pg_locks has 288 rows:
> >
> > # select locktype, mode, count(
"Kynn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How does one silence NOTICE and WARNING messages in psql? I've tried \set
> QUIET on, \set VERBOSITY terse, and even \o /dev/null, but I still get them!
Set client_min_messages to, say, ERROR. There's no psql-side control of
that.
Thanks to Eric and Tom, I think I have got it. Here is the function
for adding a new student, who can select anything in public and can do
anything at all in their own schema.
revoke all on schema public from public; -- done only once
create or replace function new_student (text) returns void a
I've written a PL/pgSQL function that is supposed to create a whole bunch
(~4000) tables:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION create_tables () RETURNS void
AS $$
DECLARE
_s RECORD;
_t TEXT;
BEGIN
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS base CASCADE;
CREATE TABLE base ( /* omit lengthy definition */ );
FOR _s IN SEL
On Mar 14, 2008, at 3:43 PM, Webb Sprague wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Erik Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 14, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Webb Sprague wrote:
Start with
revoke all on schema public from public
and then grant only what you want.
Oh -- to grant select permi
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Erik Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 14, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Webb Sprague wrote:
>
> >>> Start with
> >>>revoke all on schema public from public
> >>> and then grant only what you want.
> >
> > Oh -- to grant select permissions on all the t
On Mar 14, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Webb Sprague wrote:
Start with
revoke all on schema public from public
and then grant only what you want.
Oh -- to grant select permissions on all the tables in the public
schema, do I have to do it table-by-table? I know I can write a loop
an use informat
Hi!
How does one silence NOTICE and WARNING messages in psql? I've tried \set
QUIET on, \set VERBOSITY terse, and even \o /dev/null, but I still get them!
TIA!
Kynn
> > Start with
> > revoke all on schema public from public
> > and then grant only what you want.
Oh -- to grant select permissions on all the tables in the public
schema, do I have to do it table-by-table? I know I can write a loop
an use information_schema if necessary, but if I do
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:07 PM, David Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I imagine you can get round the second one by building your software
> > so it supports PostgreSQL as well - that way you don't 'require
> > customes to install MySQL'.
> >
> Well, I'm not sure how they'd even know yo
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Webb Sprague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Also, I revoked what I thought was everything possible on the public
> > schema, but a user is still able to create a table in that schema --
> > could someone explain:
>
> > o
"Webb Sprague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, I revoked what I thought was everything possible on the public
> schema, but a user is still able to create a table in that schema --
> could someone explain:
> oregon=# revoke create on schema public from foobar cascade;
> REVOKE
You've got a co
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Ringer) writes:
> > Erik Jones wrote:
> >> They've gotten around that by making MySQL "dual-licensed". If
> >> you're going to be using MySQL in a commercial application then you
> >> can not u
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Ringer) writes:
> Erik Jones wrote:
>> They've gotten around that by making MySQL "dual-licensed". If
>> you're going to be using MySQL in a commercial application then you
>> can not use the GPL'd version, you have to use their paid,
>> commercial license.
>>
> My underst
am Fri, dem 14.03.2008, um 13:30:02 -0500 mailte Joshua folgendes:
> Hi,
> Here is a quick and easy one I have a questions about:
>
> I have a table (customers) that has a field (firstname) with the
> following data.
>
> firstname
>
> Mike H
> Josh
> Jim B
> Katie I
> Jeff
On Mar 14, 2008, at 1:30 PM, Joshua wrote:
Hi,
Here is a quick and easy one I have a questions about:
I have a table (customers) that has a field (firstname) with the
following data.
firstname
Mike H
Josh
Jim B
Katie I
Jeff
Suzy
John R
Can someone provide the syntax
Hi,
Here is a quick and easy one I have a questions about:
I have a table (customers) that has a field (firstname) with the
following data.
firstname
Mike H
Josh
Jim B
Katie I
Jeff
Suzy
John R
Can someone provide the syntax for a SQL UPDATE statement that will
remove mi
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:34 AM, David Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It sure sounds like if your application uses MySQL and you sell your
> software (I presume this would include online services that charge for use
> of the site and that site runs MySQL under the hood), you have to buy a
> c
> I have the following function:
Now that I know how to write the function, my design flaws and lack of
understanding are more apparent...
... I was trying to give all logged in users read-only access to the
public schema, and full access to the schema that corresponds to their
username. The i
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:35:24AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In short R appears to have more than enough capability to do the job
> (from a statistical perspective), however there doesnt seem to be that
> much discussion on using the PL/R implementation, or for that matter
> tutorials on us
On 2008-03-13 23:14, Scott Marlowe wrote:
Tis the other way round I'm afriad. Schemas live in dbs, not the other way
around. Maybe you were thinking tablespaces?
You're right; I was thinking of tables, which I routinely move around
from schema to schema.
That also means he should ignore
Greg Smith wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Justin wrote:
I was wondering why the -s would not rescale the data?
First, you don't know how to rescale the data if someone is passing in
a custom script. More importantly, people don't expect the benchmark
tool to change things in tables unless s
am Fri, dem 14.03.2008, um 10:00:05 -0700 mailte Webb Sprague folgendes:
> Hi all,
>
> I have the following function:
>
> create function new_student (text) returns text as $$
> declare
> wtf integer := 1;
> begin
> execute 'create schema ' || $1;
>
"Webb Sprague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> execute 'create role ' || $1 || 'LOGIN';
I think you're short one crucial space ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://
Tom Lane wrote:
Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I was wondering why the -s would not rescale the data?
That would involve re-initializing the table contents.
If that's what you want, use -i.
regards, tom lane
thanks
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Justin wrote:
I was wondering why the -s would not rescale the data?
First, you don't know how to rescale the data if someone is passing in a
custom script. More importantly, people don't expect the benchmark tool
to change things in tables unless specifically requeste
Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering why the -s would not rescale the data?
That would involve re-initializing the table contents.
If that's what you want, use -i.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
T
On 14 Mar, 09:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("jose javier parra sanchez")
wrote:
> > itself open source, you have to pay to get a license. Pay for GPL
> > software?
>
> You cannot be serious, GPL has no relation with monetary value. The
> GPL is a 'Usage License'. If i write GPL software to my clients,
Steve Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Of course, the main problem with CLUSTER is that it needs about 2x the
>> disk space of table + indexes.
>>
> Again checking my mental model. My understanding is that CLUSTER
> basically recreates the tables and indexes and the
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
I imagine you can get round the second one by building your software
so it supports PostgreSQL as well - that way you don't 'require
customes to install MySQL'.
Well, I'm not sure how they'd even know you were doing this, but as a
commercial company, I'd suggest you not follow that advice si
Hi all,
I have the following function:
create function new_student (text) returns text as $$
declare
wtf integer := 1;
begin
execute 'create schema ' || $1;
execute 'create role ' || $1 || 'LOGIN';
execute 'revoke all on schema public from '
Hi all,
I have the following function:
create function new_student (text) returns text as $$
declare
wtf integer := 1;
begin
execute 'create schema ' || $1;
execute 'create role ' || $1 || 'LOGIN';
execute 'revoke all on schema public from '
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:34 PM, David Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> My understanding is that's not quite true. The client libraries are GPL, so
> you can't use them directly, but I don't see what would stop you using their
> ODBC/JDBC drivers with your non-GPL application (especially if
My understanding is that's not quite true. The client libraries are
GPL, so you can't use them directly, but I don't see what would stop
you using their ODBC/JDBC drivers with your non-GPL application
(especially if you support other ODBC databases as well). The server
can't be bundled in you
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 08:43 -0700, Steve Crawford wrote:
> > Also, it is MVCC-safe only from 8.3 upwards; on older versions
> > it (incorrectly) deletes dead tuples that are still visible to old
> > transactions.
> >
> >
> More interesting. I may have a broken mental-model. I *thought* that
>
Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
On Friday 14. March 2008, Adrian Klaver wrote:
Years ago I played around with MySQL because that
was what "everybody" was using. The problem was it did not do what I
wanted and Postgres did.
That pretty much sums up my experiences too. Back in 2002 when I started
fo
Tom Lane wrote:
Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, -s is only meaningful when given with -i. Maybe someday we ought
to fix pgbench to complain if you try to set it at other times.
You have to pass -s in to the actual run if y
Steve Crawford escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Also, it is MVCC-safe only from 8.3 upwards; on older versions
>> it (incorrectly) deletes dead tuples that are still visible to old
>> transactions.
>
> More interesting. I may have a broken mental-model. I *thought* that
> CLUSTER acquired
On Mar 14, 2008, at 10:36 AM, Marko Kreen wrote:
Another option:
Does not fire at all in single-user mode. This would be covered by
"Applies to non-superusers" if that were there but, by itself, the
triggers would still fire for normal superuser connections.
Seems bit too hard - you may oth
Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, -s is only meaningful when given with -i. Maybe someday we ought
>> to fix pgbench to complain if you try to set it at other times.
> You have to pass -s in to the actual run if you're specifying your own
> cu
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
You can use CLUSTER reliably only from 7.2 upwards. (Or was it 7.3? I
forget). In earlier versions it would lose information about other
indexes (i.e. those not being clustered on), foreign keys, inheritance,
etc; in other words pretty much a disaster except for the sim
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My action are:
>
> void *Execute(void *pParam)
> {
>
>
>
> & nbsp; string tableLock = "BEGIN WORK;";
> tableLock.append(" LOCK TABLE ");
> tableLock
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 03:17:27PM +0530, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:06 PM, rrahul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks to all you wonderful people out their. I don't know if its
> > your love for Postgres or nepothism that makes it look far superior
> > than mysql.
>
> I wou
Richard Huxton wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the bad text format. Below the right (I hope...) text:
Hi All.I'm using for the first time the postgres lock utilities, but
Nope, sorry. Still full of HTML stuff. Hang on, I'll see if I can fix it.
Luca's message below:
===
On 3/14/08, Erik Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > To put it to core Postgres, it needs to be conceptually sane
> > first, without needing ugly workarounds to avoid it bringing
> > whole db down.
> >
> > I can see ATM only few ways:
> >
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the bad text format. Below the right (I hope...) text:
Hi All.I'm using for the first time the postgres lock utilities, but
Nope, sorry. Still full of HTML stuff. Hang on, I'll see if I can fix it.
Luca's message below:
=
I'm using for
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
"Pavan Deolasee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
You must have initialized pgbench with scale 1.
Yeah, -s is only meaningful when given with -i. Maybe someday we ought
to fix pgbench to complain if you try to set it at other times.
You have to pass -s in to
Thanks for the replies. That's kind of what I figured, though it would be
interesting if it were possible. For example, if a financial institution
could allow their clients direct connections to a database, the clients (or
anyone) could build absolutely any interface to it they want. I think
/www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
Sponsor:
Scopri le tue passioni con Leonardo.it!
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=7615&d=20080314
Tom Lane wrote:
In connection with my Red Hat duties I've had to look at it occasionally
:-(. They definitely have a lower standard for commenting than we do.
I sure hope that there is unpublished documentation somewhere ...
And cut into the very lucrative "figuring out the MySQL source code"
Erik Jones wrote:
They've gotten around that by making MySQL "dual-licensed". If you're
going to be using MySQL in a commercial application then you can not
use the GPL'd version, you have to use their paid, commercial license.
My understanding is that's not quite true. The client libraries
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gurjeet Singh escribió:
>> I wouldn't comment on that, but having read so much about MySQL in Postgres'
>> lists, I sure have a disliking for MySQL, so much so that I haven't bothered
>> even downloading and installing it even once!!!
> I have downloade
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, all this doesn't work (the connection is the always the same in
all methods and functions).
I do not understand this statement.
There are some other things you could mention that might help:
Why do you need these table level locks - what are you trying to achi
On Mar 14, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Marko Kreen wrote:
To put it to core Postgres, it needs to be conceptually sane
first, without needing ugly workarounds to avoid it bringing
whole db down.
I can see ATM only few ways:
- Applies only to non-superusers.
- Error from CONNECT trigger does not affect
On Mar 14, 2008, at 3:26 AM, jose javier parra sanchez wrote:
itself open source, you have to pay to get a license. Pay for GPL
software?
You cannot be serious, GPL has no relation with monetary value. The
GPL is a 'Usage License'. If i write GPL software to my clients,
should i give it fr
On Mar 14, 2008, at 7:22 AM, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
Still I'd be curious to know if people can scale pg to several
hundreds(?) machines without loosing the features that differentiate
it from other DB...
Jan Weick wrote Slony which was released by Affilias who runs the top-
level regis
Gurjeet Singh escribió:
> I wouldn't comment on that, but having read so much about MySQL in Postgres'
> lists, I sure have a disliking for MySQL, so much so that I haven't bothered
> even downloading and installing it even once!!!
I have downloaded the source at different periods of time. The f
"Pavan Deolasee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Enrico Sirola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> as you see, the reported scaling factor is 1, but I specified -s 1000,
> You must have initialized pgbench with scale 1.
Yeah, -s is only meaningful when given with -i. May
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All.
I'm using for the first time the postgres lock utilities, but brobably
I'm doing something of not legal.My action are:void *Execute(void
*pParam){
string tableL
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:00:39 -0600
Micah Yoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe it's nuts to consider such a setup (and if you're talking a
major bank it probably is) ... and maybe not. At this point it's
kind of a mental
Clodoaldo escribió:
> 2008/3/14, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > A quick look into pg_locks should tell you if it's blocking.
>
> pg_prepared_xacts is empty and pg_locks has 288 rows:
>
> # select locktype, mode, count(*) as total
> from pg_locks group by locktype, mode;
>locktype
On Friday 14 March 2008 4:19 am, Kakoli Sen wrote:
> Hello all,
> I'm giving the query
> GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON SEQUENCE object_seq TO tester;
> ERROR: syntax error at or near "object_seq" at character 34.
>
> \ds is listing out the sequence.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kakoli
Try:
GRANT ALL PRIVIL
peration on this table,
and unlock the table all in the same function scope? Any
Idea?Thanks in advance.Luca
--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
Sponsor:
Una BMW Z4 Roadster a 10? Prova gratis su Bidplaza.it!
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=7673&d=20080314
2008/3/14, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Clodoaldo escribió:
>
>
> > Postgresql was restarted twice, but yes, it is as if the crash left
> > some kind of permanent lock somewhere.
>
>
> A prepared transaction perhaps? SELECT * FROM pg_prepared_xacts;
>
> A quick look into pg_locks shoul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:00:39 -0600
Micah Yoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe it's nuts to consider such a setup (and if you're talking a
> major bank it probably is) ... and maybe not. At this point it's
> kind of a mental exercise. :-)
If you
Clodoaldo escribió:
> Postgresql was restarted twice, but yes, it is as if the crash left
> some kind of permanent lock somewhere.
A prepared transaction perhaps? SELECT * FROM pg_prepared_xacts;
A quick look into pg_locks should tell you if it's blocking.
--
Alvaro Herrera
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:28:37 +0100
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I still find impressing that Google uses MySQL... I can guess why,
> What makes you so sure Google don't use PostgreSQL *as well*?
I'm not sure... in fact I never excluded they could use pg for other
stuff... They
Marc Horvath, 14.03.2008 12:35:
I was wondering if anyone had any working sample code of inserting a
blob into a table and then retrieving one from a table for viewing?
I’m using Postgres 8.2, the jdbc is postgresql-8.2-504.jdbc3, and the
Java is 1.6.
I’m also running on a Windows XP Pro bo
On 3/14/08, Dawid Kuroczko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/13/08, Dawid Kuroczko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > An application which uses tsearch2 ('SELECT set_curdict() /
> > set_curcfg()' being
> > > called upo
Hi,
I will have to try again. I know that I was probably not specific enough in
my first attempt.
The systems on which we have tested and are getting the error:
- PostgreSQL 8.2.4 (also tried 8.2.6 without db upgrade) configured with
'enable_thread_safety'.
- Linux Slackware 10.2.0
I was wondering if anyone had any working sample code of inserting a blob
into a table and then retrieving one from a table for viewing?
I'm using Postgres 8.2, the jdbc is postgresql-8.2-504.jdbc3, and the Java
is 1.6.
I'm also running on a Windows XP Pro box if that matters.
Thanks,
Marc
Micah Yoder wrote:
Just curious, would PostgreSQL be considered secure for applications involving
financial matters where the clients have a direct database logon?
First, to clarify, I'm not in a serious position to write such an application.
I'm just wondering. :-) If it is possible, I may
Hello all,
I'm giving the query
GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON SEQUENCE object_seq TO tester;
ERROR: syntax error at or near "object_seq" at character 34.
\ds is listing out the sequence.
Regards,
Kakoli
KAKOLI SEN
On Friday 14. March 2008, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> Years ago I played around with MySQL because that
> was what "everybody" was using. The problem was it did not do what I
> wanted and Postgres did.
That pretty much sums up my experiences too. Back in 2002 when I started
fooling around with databa
2008/3/14, Pavan Deolasee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Clodoaldo
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Try vacuuming pg_class, pg_index, pg_attribute manually and see if that
> > > makes the problem go away.
> >
> > It does not go away.
> >
>
>
> Can it b
2008/3/14, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Clodoaldo
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2008/3/13, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Clodoaldo escribió:
> > >
> > > > 2008/3/13, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > Clodoaldo escribió:
Micah Yoder wrote:
> Just curious, would PostgreSQL be considered secure for applications
> involving
> financial matters where the clients have a direct database logon?
I'd say that an application where clients have a database login
and can perform arbitrary SQL statements is not very robust an
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:06 PM, rrahul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks to all you wonderful people out their. I don't know if its your
> love
> for Postgres or nepothism that makes it look far superior than mysql.
I wouldn't comment on that, but having read so much about MySQL in Postgres
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Enrico Sirola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> as you see, the reported scaling factor is 1, but I specified -s 1000,
> which seems strange... I'm going to recompile it from the sources now.
> Didn't I get anything or there is a bug somewhere?
You must have initi
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:29:07AM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:08:27 -0400
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On 14/03/2008, rrahul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I see Mysql bosting for Google,Yahoo
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 08:08:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 14/03/2008, rrahul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I see Mysql bosting for Google,Yahoo, Alcatel..
> >> What about Postgres the list is not that impressive.
>
> > What then? Coul
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Clodoaldo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Try vacuuming pg_class, pg_index, pg_attribute manually and see if that
> > makes the problem go away.
>
> It does not go away.
>
Can it be a case where some other open transaction is holding a lock
on the table ? No
Hello,
I'm trying to perform some benchmarks using pgbench. I'm using the
following rpm package:
postgresql-contrib-8.3.0-2PGDG.rhel5
for x86_64, downloaded from the pgsql yum repository for centos5/amd64.
When I init the pgbench database, the scale factor seems to work,
however when perfor
> itself open source, you have to pay to get a license. Pay for GPL software?
You cannot be serious, GPL has no relation with monetary value. The
GPL is a 'Usage License'. If i write GPL software to my clients,
should i give it free of charge ?. That's absurd.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailin
Just curious, would PostgreSQL be considered secure for applications involving
financial matters where the clients have a direct database logon?
First, to clarify, I'm not in a serious position to write such an application.
I'm just wondering. :-) If it is possible, I may make a proof of conc
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 08:26 +0100, A. Kretschmer wrote:
> am Fri, dem 14.03.2008, um 15:06:56 +0800 mailte Ow Mun Heng folgendes:
> >
> > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 07:53 +0100, A. Kretschmer wrote:
> > > am Fri, dem 14.03.2008, um 14:28:15 +0800 mailte Ow Mun Heng folgendes:
> > > > query is someth
am Fri, dem 14.03.2008, um 15:06:56 +0800 mailte Ow Mun Heng folgendes:
>
> On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 07:53 +0100, A. Kretschmer wrote:
> > am Fri, dem 14.03.2008, um 14:28:15 +0800 mailte Ow Mun Heng folgendes:
> > > query is something like this
> > >
> > > Select *
> > > from v_test
> > > w
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 07:53 +0100, A. Kretschmer wrote:
> am Fri, dem 14.03.2008, um 14:28:15 +0800 mailte Ow Mun Heng folgendes:
> > query is something like this
> >
> > Select *
> > from v_test
> > where acode Like 'PC%'
> > and rev = '0Q'
> > and hcm = '1'
> > and mcm
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 00:50 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > query is something like this
> >
> > Select *
> > from v_test
> > where acode Like 'PC%'
> > and rev = '0Q'
> > and hcm = '
92 matches
Mail list logo