On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com writes:
I'm interested in seeing:
* the date for the most recent result
* test name (identifier)
* most recent result (decimal value)
* the worst (lowest decimal value) test result from
Greetings,
I have a postgresql-9.3.x database with a table with a variety of date
stamped test results, some of which are stored in json format
(natively in the database). I'm attempting to use some window
functions to pull out specific data from the test results over a a
time window, but part of
shigeru.han...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lonni,
2013/9/25 Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com:
The problem that I'm experiencing is if I attempt to perform an INSERT
on the foreign nppsmoke table on cluster a, it fails claiming that the
table partition which should hold the data in the INSERT does
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com writes:
Thanks for your reply. This sounds like a relatively simple
workaround, so I'll give it a try. Is the search_path of the remote
session that postgres_fdw forces considered
Greetings,
I've recently pushed a new postgres-9.3 (Linux-x86_64/RHEL6) cluster
into production, with one master, and two hot standby streaming
replication slaves. Everything seems to be working ok, however
roughly half of my pg_basebackup attempts are failing at the very end
with the error:
I've got two 9.3 clusters, with a postgres foreign data wrapper (FDW)
setup to point from one cluster to the other. One of the (foreign)
tables associated with the foreign server has a bigint sequence for
its primary key, defined as:
id | bigint | not null
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com writes:
If I INSERT a new row into the local table (not the foreign table
version), without specifying the 'id' column explicitly, it
automatically is assigned the nextval in the sequence
Greetings,
I've got two different 9.3 clusters setup, a b (on Linux if that
matters). On cluster b, I have a table (nppsmoke) that is partitioned
by date (month), which uses a function which is called by a trigger to
manage INSERTS (exactly as documented in the official documentation
for
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote:
top shows over 90% of the load is in sys space. vmstat output
seems to suggest that its CPU bound (or bouncing back forth):
Can you run `perf top` during an episode and see
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote:
top shows over 90% of the load is in sys space. vmstat output
seems to suggest that its CPU bound (or bouncing back forth):
Can you run `perf top` during an episode and see
Greetings,
I'm running a PostgreSQL 9.3.0 cluster (1 master with two streaming
replication hot standby slaves) on RHEL6-x86_64. Yesterday I upgraded
from 9.2.4 to 9.3.0, and since the upgrade I'm seeing a significant
performance degradation. PostgreSQL simply feels slower. Nothing
other than
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:19:29 -0700
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I'm running a PostgreSQL 9.3.0 cluster (1 master with two streaming
replication hot standby slaves) on RHEL6-x86_64. Yesterday I
Thanks for your reply. Comments/answers inline below
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com
wrote:
c) What does logs say?
The postgres server logs look perfectly normal, minus
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi,
On 2013-09-17 09:19:29 -0700, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
I'm running a PostgreSQL 9.3.0 cluster (1 master with two streaming
replication hot standby slaves) on RHEL6-x86_64. Yesterday I upgraded
from 9.2.4
The first thing to do is look at your server logs around the time when
it stopped working.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Joseph Marlin jmar...@saucontech.com wrote:
We're having an issue with our warm standby server. About 9:30 last night, it
stopped applying changes it received in WAL
I've never seen this happen. Looks like you might be using 9.1? Are
you up to date on all the 9.1.x releases?
Do you have just 1 slave syncing from the master?
Which OS are you using?
Did you verify that there aren't any network problems between the
slave master?
Or hardware problems (like the
again so if it is a network issue, the
replication is just stopping after some hiccup instead of retrying and
resuming when things are back up.
Thanks!
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've never seen this happen. Looks like you might be using
= -1
#log_checkpoints = off
#log_connections = off
#log_disconnections = off
#log_error_verbosity = default
I'm going to have a look at the NICs to make sure there's no issue there.
Thanks again for your help!
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com
wrote
Greetings,
I have a postgresql-9.3-beta1 cluster setup (from the
yum.postgresql.org RPMs), where I'm experimenting with the postgres
FDW extension. The documentation (
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/postgres-fdw.html )
references three Cost Estimation Options which can be set for a
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com writes:
nightly=# ALTER SERVER cuda_db10 OPTIONS (SET use_remote_estimate 'true') ;
ERROR: option use_remote_estimate not found
Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug
Greetings,
I just got around to upgrading from 9.3-beta1 to 9.3-beta2, and was
surprised to see that the server was refusing to start. In the log,
I'm seeing:
2013-07-24 13:41:47 PDT [7083]: [1-1] db=,user= FATAL: database files
are incompatible with server
2013-07-24 13:41:47 PDT [7083]: [2-1]
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Lonni J Friedman escribió:
I'm using the RPMs from yum.postgresql.org on RHEL6. Is this
expected, intentional behavior? Do I really need to dump reload to
upgrade between
Looks like some kind of data corruption. Question is whether it came
from the master, or was created by the standby. If you re-seed the
standby with a full (base) backup, does the problem go away?
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Dan Kogan d...@iqtell.com wrote:
Hello,
Today our standby
and has been working for about 2 hours.
The file in the error message was an index. We rebuilt it just in case.
Is there any way to debug the issue at this point?
-Original Message-
From: Lonni J Friedman [mailto:netll...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 4:11 PM
To: Dan
Greetings,
I'm trying to test out the new postgres-fdw support in postgresql-9.3
(beta) in preparation for an upgrade from 9.2 later this year. So
far, everything is working ok, however one problem I'm encountering is
with the COPY command. When I run it against a foreign table (which is
also in
AM, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
Greetings,
I'm trying to test out the new postgres-fdw support in postgresql-9.3
(beta) in preparation for an upgrade from 9.2 later this year. So
far, everything is working ok, however one problem I'm encountering is
with the COPY command. When I run it against
I'm attempting to write a custom pgbench script (called via the -f
option), with a variable set at the top with:
\setrandom aid 100 50875000
However, I can't quite figure out how to reference the new aid
variable. The documentation simply states that a variable is
referenced with a colon in
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Igor Neyman iney...@perceptron.com wrote:
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of AI Rumman
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 1:56 PM
To: Fabio Rueda Carrascosa
Cc: pgsql-general
Subject: Re: [GENERAL]
Its definitely not a bug. You need to set/increase wal_keep_segments
to a value that ensures that they aren't recycled faster than the time
required to complete the base backup (plus some buffer).
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Sergey Koposov kopo...@ast.cam.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
I've recently
kopo...@ast.cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
Its definitely not a bug. You need to set/increase wal_keep_segments
to a value that ensures that they aren't recycled faster than the time
required to complete the base backup (plus some buffer).
But I thought
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:03 PM, David Boreham david_l...@boreham.org
wrote:
On 5/10/2013 10:21 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
As it turns out the list of flash drives are suitable for database use is
surprisingly small.
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Steven Schlansker ste...@likeness.com wrote:
On May 10, 2013, at 7:14 AM, Matt Brock m...@mattbrock.co.uk wrote:
Hello.
We're intending to deploy PostgreSQL on Linux with SSD drives which would be
in a RAID 1 configuration with Hardware RAID.
My first
If its really index corruption, then you should be able to fix it by
reindexing. However, that doesn't explain what caused the corruption.
Perhaps your hardware is bad in some way?
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Adarsh Sharma eddy.ada...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Sergey for such a quick
You should figure out what base/16384/114846.39 corresponds to inside
the database. If you're super lucky its something unimportant and/or
something that can be recreated easily (like an index). If its
something important, then you're only option is to try to drop the
object and restore it from
Looks like you've got some form of coruption:
page 1441792 of relation base/63229/63370 does not exist
The question is whether it was corrupted on the master and then
replicated to the slave, or if it was corrupted on the slave. I'd
guess that the pg_dump tried to read from that page and
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:37 PM, AI Rumman rumman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have two 9.2 databases running with hot_standby replication. Today when I
was checking, I found that replication has not been working since Mar 1st.
There was a large database restored in master on that day and I
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:43 PM, AI Rumman rumman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:37 PM, AI Rumman rumman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have two 9.2 databases running with hot_standby replication
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:55 PM, AI Rumman rumman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:43 PM, AI Rumman rumman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:23 PM, AI Rumman rumman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:03 PM, AI Rumman rumman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:55 PM, AI Rumman rumman...@gmail.com wrote
I'm pretty sure that unlogged tables and temp tables are two separate
distinct features, with no overlap in functionality. It would be
nice if it was possible to create an unlogged temp table.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 1:32 PM, aasat satri...@veranet.pl wrote:
I was tested write speed to
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm pretty sure that unlogged tables and temp tables are two separate
distinct features, with no overlap in functionality. It would
It sounds like all you did was setup the slave from scratch with a
fresh base backup, without understanding or debugging what caused
everything to break. Clearly whatever was wrong on March 5 is still
wrong, and nothing has been fixed. The first step in debugging this
problem is to look at
That process merely sets up a new server, it doesn't start streaming,
unless the server has been configured correctly. You state that the
slave crashed after two hours. How did you make this determination?
All you seem to be doing is setting up the slave from scratch
repeatedly, and assuming
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 1:51 PM, akp geek akpg...@gmail.com wrote:
thank you. As you mentioned, I understood that I am starting the streaming
scratch which is not what I wanted to do.
Here is what I am planning to .
Our replication process was down since March5th.
1. Is it Ok to get all
looking for the most straightforward path
I'd recommend going to 9.0.12. Also be sure to read the release notes
first.
We use GIST indexes quite a bit. and we gis also
I recently compiled postgres 9.2 ..
Regards
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote
Did you shut down the 'old' postgres before copying these files?
Did you (re)configure the 'new' postgres to set its $PGDATA directory
to the location of the 'new' files?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:46 PM, JD Wong jdmsw...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried copying postgres over to a new directory. it was
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:02 PM, JD Wong jdmsw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Adrian, yes I completely copied the config-file and data directories
over.
Lonnie, I don't remember. I might not have shut down the old postgres,
yes I set PGDATA accordingly.
That's guaranteed to break everything badly.
does postgres know about this?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/backup-file.html
Thanks,
-JD
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:02 PM, JD Wong jdmsw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Adrian, yes I completely copied
Greetings,
I'm running postgres-9.2.2 in a Linux-x86_64 cluster with 1 master and
several hot standby servers. Since upgrading to 9.2.2 from 9.1.x a
few months ago, I switched from generating a base backup on the
master, to generating it on a dedicated slave/standby (to reduce the
load on the
Greetings,
I'm running postgres-9.2.2 in a Linux-x86_64 cluster with 1 master and
several hot standby servers. Since upgrading to 9.2.2 from 9.1.x a
few months ago, I switched from generating a base backup on the
master, to generating it on a dedicated slave/standby (to reduce the
load on the
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Greg Donald gdon...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if this is the wrong list, but I've been stuck for a couple days
now. I tried pgpool-general but that list appears to not like me.
I'm not getting any posts and my post hasn't shown up in the archives.
Specifically
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Bryan Montgomery mo...@english.net wrote:
We have a test 9.2.0 db running on openSuse 12.2. When I select now() I get
the correct timezone and date back (-5 hours).
When I do date at the os prompt, I get the right timezone back.
I changed postgres.conf to have
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Bryan Montgomery mo...@english.net wrote:
I changed postgres.conf to have timezone = 'EST' and restarted postgres.
However the log file is still 5
I'm no expert on this, but it will likely be more helpful to others if
you include the table description with all the indices.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Edson Richter edsonrich...@hotmail.com wrote:
I've a table with 110 rows, with streets.
I'm making a partial search using zip code,
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Thalis Kalfigkopoulos
tkalf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I read somewhere that the following query gives a quick estimate of the # of
rows in a table regardless of the table's size (which would matter in a
simple SELECT count(*)?):
SELECT (CASE WHEN reltuples
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Thalis Kalfigkopoulos
tkalf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Thalis Kalfigkopoulos
tkalf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I read somewhere that the following query
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Ian Harding harding@gmail.com wrote:
I had a 9.0.8 hot standby setup, one master, two slaves, working great.
Then, I tried to re-initialize by making a base backup, the way I've done it
many times before, but for some reason I can't get the standby to accept
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Ian Harding harding@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Ian Harding harding@gmail.com wrote:
I had a 9.0.8 hot standby setup, one master, two slaves, working great
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Ian Harding harding@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Ian Harding harding@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Ian Harding harding@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Ian Harding harding@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Edson Richter
edsonrich...@hotmail.com wrote:
I've two PostgreSQL 9.1.6 running on Linux CentOS 5.8 64bit.
They are replicated asynchronously.
Yesterday, I've dropped a database of 20Gb, and then replication has broken,
requiring me to manually synchronize
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Edson Richter
edsonrich...@hotmail.com wrote:
Em 31/10/2012 15:39, Lonni J Friedman escreveu:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Edson Richter
edsonrich...@hotmail.com wrote:
I've two PostgreSQL 9.1.6 running on Linux CentOS 5.8 64bit.
They are replicated
pg_upgrade has worked fine for several releases. I believe that the
only time when pg_upgrade isn't a viable option is for some types of
GIST indices.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Nikolas Everett nik9...@gmail.com wrote:
I was just looking at
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Chitra Creta chitracr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I currently have a table that is growing very quickly - i.e 7 million
records in 5 days. This table acts as a placeholder for statistics, and
hence the records are merely inserted and never updated or deleted.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:28 AM, pfote pf...@ypsilon.net wrote:
Hi,
I had a very strange effect on the weekend that smells like a bug, so i'd
like so share it.
Setup:
machine A: 16 CPU Cores (modern), 128GB RAM, nice 6-drive SAS Raid-10
machines B, C: 8 Cores (substantially older than A),
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Mike Roest mike.ro...@replicon.com wrote:
Hey Everyone,
We currently have a 9.1.5 postgres cluster running using streaming
replication. We have 3 nodes right now
2 - local that are setup with pacemaker for a HA master/slave set failover
cluster
1 -
Just curious, is there a reason why you can't use pg_basebackup ?
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Mike Roest mike.ro...@replicon.com wrote:
Is there any hidden issue with this that we haven't seen. Or does anyone
have suggestions as to an alternate procedure that will allow 2 slaves to
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Manoj Agarwal m...@ockham.be wrote:
Hi,
I have two virtual machines with two different versions of Postgresql. One
machine contains Postgres 7.4.19 and another has Postgres 8.4.3. I also
have other instances of these two virtual machines. I need to
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:22 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 07/24/12 1:28 PM, jkells wrote:
from psql
I have tried several ways including creating a function to read a file
without any success but basically I want to do something like the
following from a bash shell
psql
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
jtkells jtke...@verizon.net writes:
Thanks much for your reply, that does the trick quite nicely. But, I just
came to the realization that this only works if your are running the
client and the file both resides on the
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Ilya Ivanov f...@ngs.ru wrote:
I have a 8.4 database (installed on ubuntu 10.04 x86_64). It holds Zabbix
database. The database on disk takes 10Gb. SQL dump takes only 2Gb. I've
gone through
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2008-08/msg00316.php and
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Ilya Ivanov f...@ngs.ru wrote:
I have a 8.4 database (installed on ubuntu 10.04 x86_64). It holds Zabbix
database. The database on disk takes 10Gb
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Sam Z J sammyjiang...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I'm curious how is wildcards at both ends implemented, e.g. LIKE '%str%'
How efficient is it if that's the only search criteria against a large
table? how much does indexing the column help and roughly how much
on any query (read or write) being horrible
(seconds to minutes). As soon as the basebackup completes, perf
returns to normal (and the load drops back down to 1.00 or less).
How can I debug what's wrong?
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com writes:
Running 9.1.3 on Linux-x86_64. I'm seeing autovacuum running for the
past 6 hours on a newly created table that only has 1 row of data in
it. This table did exist previously
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
This seems to have been noticed and fixed in HEAD:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.gita=commitdiffh
Running 9.1.3 on Linux-x86_64. I'm seeing autovacuum running for the
past 6 hours on a newly created table that only has 1 row of data in
it. This table did exist previously, but was dropped recreated.
I'm not sure if that might explain this behavior. When I strace the
autovacuum process, I
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Can you correlate the performance hit with any specific part of
autovacuum? In particular, I'm wondering
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Gavin Flower
gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz wrote:
On 24/05/12 08:18, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Gavin Flower
gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz wrote:
On 24/05/12 05:09, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tom
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com writes:
No, not lots of subqueries or ORDERing, and most queries only touch a
single table. However, I'm honestly not sure that I'm following where
you're going with this. The problem
Thanks for your reply.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Andy Colson a...@squeakycode.net wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Lonni J Friedmannetll...@gmail.com
wrote:
Greetings,
When I got in this morning, I found
an autovacuum process that had been running since just before the load
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com writes:
After banging my head on the wall for a long time, I happened to
notice that khugepaged was consuming 100% CPU every time autovacuum
was running. I did:
echo madvise /sys/kernel
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Gavin Flower
gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz wrote:
On 24/05/12 05:09, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com writes:
After banging my head on the wall for a long time
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Gavin Flower gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz writes:
16 core Xeon X5550 2.67GHz
128GB RAM
$PGDATA sits on a RAID5 array comprised of 3 SATA disks. Its Linux's
md software RAID.
How does this compare to your other machines
No one has any ideas or suggestions, or even questions? If someone
needs more information, I'd be happy to provide it.
This problem is absolutely killing me.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I have a 4 server postgresql-9.1.3 cluster (one
Greetings,
I have a 4 server postgresql-9.1.3 cluster (one master doing streaming
replication to 3 hot standby servers). All of them are running
Fedora-16-x86_64. Last Friday I upgraded the entire cluster from
Fedora-15 with postgresql-9.0.6 to Fedora-16 with postgresql-9.1.3.
I'm finding that
scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
Do the queries here help?
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Lock_Monitoring
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I have a 4 server postgresql-9.1.3 cluster (one master doing streaming
replication to 3 hot standby
Greetings,
I have a 4 server postgresql-9.1.3 cluster (one master doing streaming
replication to 3 hot standby servers). All of them are running
Fedora-16-x86_64. Last Friday I upgraded the entire cluster from
Fedora-15 with postgresql-9.0.6 to Fedora-16 with postgresql-9.1.3. I
made no changes
Greetings,
I'm running postgresql-9.1.3 on a Linux-x86_64 (Fedora16, if it
matters) system. I noticed the existence of pg_basebackup starting in
9.1, and figured I'd try it out and see if it would simplify our
backup management processes.
$ pg_basebackup -P -v -D /tmp/backup -x -Ft -z -U
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 19:51, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, lesson learned, I need to either invoke pg_basebackup as the
same user that runs the database (or is specified with the -U
parameter
Greetings,
I'm running postgresql-9.1.3 on a Linux-x86_64 (Fedora16, if it
matters) system. I noticed the existence of pg_basebackup starting in
9.1, and figured I'd try it out and see if it would simplify our
backup management processes. I setup a test system (same OS
postgresql version as
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 03:07:02PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 15:30 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:01:31PM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
I've got a 3 node cluster (1 master/2
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:01:31PM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
I've got a 3 node cluster (1 master/2 slaves) running 9.0.x with
streaming replication. I'm in the planning stages of upgrading to
9.1.x, and am looking
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at wrote:
Lonni J Friedman wrote:
After reading this interesting article on shared_buffers and wal_buffers:
http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2012/03/tuning-sharedbuffers-and-walbuffers.html
it got me wondering if my settings were
After reading this interesting article on shared_buffers and wal_buffers:
http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2012/03/tuning-sharedbuffers-and-walbuffers.html
it got me wondering if my settings were ideal. Is there some way to
measure wal_buffer usage in real time, so that I could simply monitor
it for
I've got a 3 node cluster (1 master/2 slaves) running 9.0.x with
streaming replication. I'm in the planning stages of upgrading to
9.1.x, and am looking into the most efficient way to do the upgrade
with the goal of minimizing downtime risk. After googling, the only
discussion that I've found
Greetings,
I've got a PostgreSQL-9.0.x database that manages an automated testing
environment. There are a bunch of tables that contain assorted static
data (OS versions, test names, etc) named 'buildlist' 'osversmap'.
However, there are also two tables which contain data which changes
often.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:57 PM, David Johnston pol...@yahoo.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Lonni J Friedman
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 4:13 PM
To: pgsql-general
Subject: [GENERAL
Greetings,
I'm running PostgreSQL-9.0.4 on a Linux-x86_64 cluster with 1 master,
and two streaming replication slaves. Since late yesterday, the load
on the server has been noticably higher (5.00+) than normal (generally
under 1.00). I investigated, and found that for the past ~18 hours,
there's
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com writes:
When I strace PID 30188, I see tons of this scrolling past quickly,
but I'm not really sure what it means beyond a 'Timeout' not looking
good:
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 32000
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
