> On Jan 12, 2016, at 12:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> [ just a few comments on specific points ]
>
> "Greg Sabino Mullane" writes:
>>> 2. The CoC is not about being offended. The act of being offended is
>>> purely a recipient response and usually the offended individual is more
>>> interested
> On Jan 12, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
>> All because somebody just *had* to personally insult someone else,
>> repeatedly, and nobody thought that was a bad thing, and when the
>> recipient finally objected, the objection was cha
> On Jan 10, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 01/10/2016 10:44 AM, Regina Obe wrote:
>
>>> JD
>>
>> This may come as a big shock to many of you, but as a contributor
>> I don't care if you are racist, sexist, transphobic or whatever as long as
>> you
>
> I think this is reasona
> On Aug 25, 2015, at 1:38 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>
>> In most cases developers don’t care about index, unique, foreign key, or
>> primary key names (from a coding standpoint)
>
> Until the day they’d like to write a reliable database change script.
Not sure I understand. Once the object
> On Aug 22, 2015, at 10:15 AM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
> 6. Although it is legal to use the form "column TYPE PRIMARY KEY," It is best
> to specify as a CONSTRAINT,
>that way YOU get to choose the name, otherwise postgres assigns a default
> name which may not be to your liking.
>EG: ,
e and the execution time of query before actually creating that
> Index. Is there any provision to do that in Postgres (or) suggest any way to
> find that
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Neil Tiffin <mailto:ne...@neiltiffin.com>> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 26, 20
> On Feb 26, 2015, at 12:47 AM, Sreerama Manoj
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I use Postgres 9.4 database.Now,I am optimizing the queries by using the
> results of "explain" and "explain analyze",Sometimes I am creating Indexes to
> optimize them. But, I was not successful sometimes as even I create
Trying to wrap my head around postgresql 9.4 jsonb and would like some help
figuring out how to do the following.
Given the following example jsonb:
‘{“name1” : value1, “name2” : value2, “name3” : [int1, int2, int3]
}’::jsonb AS table1.column1
Wanted: Return the “name3” array only,
On Sep 22, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Paul Jungwirth
wrote:
>>> Can you confirm that your software is SHA-256 Compliant?
>
> Postgres's SSL certificate & key live at the value of ssl_cert_file
> and ssl_key_file in your postgresql.conf. Why not point it at a
> SHA-256 certificate, restart, and try it ou
On Feb 6, 2014, at 12:44 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Merlin, this reminds me of the quote from Mencken: For every complex
> problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.
Or as Niklaus Wirth said.
... complexity has and will maintain a strong fascination for many people. It
is t
On Jul 23, 2013, at 7:29 PM, Some Developer wrote:
> I've done quite a bit of reading on stored procedures recently and the
> consensus seems to be that you shouldn't use them unless you really must.
Application architecture is a specific software engineering discipline. These
types of genera
On Jun 29, 2013, at 11:24 AM, bhanu udaya wrote:
> Upper and Lower functions are not right choice when the table is > 2.5
> million and where we also have heavy insert transactions.
PostgreSQL and SQL Server are completely different. Rules that apply to SQL
Server do not necessarily apply to
On Jan 9, 2012, at 5:07 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 09:56, Damiano ALBANI
>>> I believe DB2 is pretty much it in this area.
>>
>> For the record, it looks like MS SQL Server has some equivalent feature :
>> FILESTREAM.
>
> And Oracle has BFILE.
>
> I've actually been thinking
On Oct 8, 2011, at 1:01 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Fournier?= writes:
>> I've tried installation 8.4 and 9.0 on two different machines, and at the
>> end can't start Postgresql. Here's the basic story:
>
> No, you started it all right, because it's there in the ps output:
>
>
On Sep 24, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 14:43 -0500, Neil Tiffin wrote:
>> On Sep 24, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/23/2011 02:33 PM, Neil Tiffin wrote:
>>>> I have shared_buffers in the config file se
On Sep 24, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 09/23/2011 02:33 PM, Neil Tiffin wrote:
>> I have shared_buffers in the config file set for 32 MB and pgAdmin
>> reports a value of 32 MB, but pgAdmin also says the current value is
>> 4096. Can anyone point me to a
Hello all,
I am hoping someone can help me with 9.0.4 server on 8GB Mac w/Snow Leopard and
shared_buffers configuration setting.
I have shared_buffers in the config file set for 32 MB and pgAdmin reports a
value of 32 MB, but pgAdmin also says the current value is 4096. Can anyone
point me
17 matches
Mail list logo
