We've been using EMS PostgreSQL admin.Pros:It has great visual tools for building views. Like in Enterprise manager or MS Access. pgAdmin don't have that.Great import/export abilities. PGAdmin don't have much flexibility.
Cons:Too bad it don't support UNICODE and not known if it will.Problems with
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian G. Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 May 2006 21:15
> Cc: A.M.; Dave Page; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> > A.M. wrote:
> >> Excellent c
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
A.M. wrote:
Excellent catch! I was wondering why I couldn't get it to freeze. I now
have a backtrace:
poll()
wxPaletteBase::~wxPaletteBase
g_main_context_check()
g_main_run_loop_run()
gtk_main()
wxEventLoop::Run()
So the evidence points to a wx bug in the destructor to w
A.M. wrote:
Excellent catch! I was wondering why I couldn't get it to freeze. I now
have a backtrace:
poll()
wxPaletteBase::~wxPaletteBase
g_main_context_check()
g_main_run_loop_run()
gtk_main()
wxEventLoop::Run()
So the evidence points to a wx bug in the destructor to wxPaletteBase
perhaps?
H
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
It took me a while to find out how exactly to reproducte the hang (It
would happen to me about once a day when using pgadmin3 heavily on
gnome/metacity, but when trying to reproduce it, I couldn't).
You have to select some text, and then _doubleclick_ on the selected
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: A.M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 May 2006 15:05
To: Dave Page
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
I'm unable to reproduce this problem with pgAdmin SVN-trunk
built with
wxGTK 2.6.3 on Slackware-current with KDE.
Can anyone
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Kratzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 May 2006 15:30
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Tino Wildenhain; Christopher Browne; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed
Hi,
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian Kratzer
Sent: 17 May 2006 15:14
To: Tino Wildenhain
Cc: Christopher Browne; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
I only use
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Christian Kratzer
> Sent: 17 May 2006 15:14
> To: Tino Wildenhain
> Cc: Christopher Browne; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Christopher Browne wrote:
Also most DBAs are not hard core OSS programmers and anyone coming
from a commercial system is more than likely used to running the
admin tools on windows.
We have a whole department of DBAs, *none* of whom have Micros
Christopher Browne wrote:
>> Also most DBAs are not hard core OSS programmers and anyone coming
>> from a commercial system is more than likely used to running the
>> admin tools on windows.
>
> We have a whole department of DBAs, *none* of whom have Microsoft on
> their desktops.
>
> Further, th
> Also most DBAs are not hard core OSS programmers and anyone coming
> from a commercial system is more than likely used to running the
> admin tools on windows.
We have a whole department of DBAs, *none* of whom have Microsoft on
their desktops.
Further, the Big, Important Systems that we admini
> -Original Message-
> From: A.M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 May 2006 15:05
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
>
> > I'm unable to reproduce this problem with pgAdmin SVN-trunk
> built with
> > wxGTK 2.6.3 o
You should try the new MacBook Jim! The 17" is out now. I used to
have the 17" PB G4, but now I have a 15" MacBook Pro with 2GB of RAM.
It's a sweet machine! Very fast too.
Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | [EMAI
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 02:02:27PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 11:39, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > > I am regularly dealing with customers, and specifically developers that
> > > > are running Linux+PostgreSQL on the server... but their desktop of
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Caduto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 May 2006 14:58
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> All that page mentions is the weird quirks on win32, I am
> sure you know what those are, i.e. windows sud
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian G. Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 May 2006 19:05
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Tino Wildenhain; Kenneth Downs; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> Here are the details of my confi
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Florian G. Pflug
Sent: 14 May 2006 18:50
To: Tino Wildenhain
Cc: Kenneth Downs; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
It only happens in pgAdmin III, though
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth
DownsSent: 15 May 2006 15:14To:
pgsql-general@postgresql.orgSubject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI
Interface
Kenneth Downs wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
kernel 2.6.8KDE
Kenneth Downs wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
kernel 2.6.8
KDE 3.3.2
gtk+ 2.4.14
pgadmin3 1.2.2
The window manager would be whatever the default for KDE is.
OK, the first thing you really should do is
upgrade to pgAdmin 1.4.2 and (if b
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth
DownsSent: 15 May 2006 14:24Cc:
pgsql-general@postgresql.orgSubject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI
Interface
Dave Page wrote:
kernel 2.6.8KDE
3.3.2gtk+ 2.4.14pgadmin3 1.2.2The window
Dave Page wrote:
kernel 2.6.8
KDE 3.3.2
gtk+ 2.4.14
pgadmin3 1.2.2
The window manager would be whatever the default for KDE is.
OK, the first thing you really should do is
upgrade to pgAdmin 1.4.2 and (if building form source) wxWidgets 2.6.3.
There have b
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Florian G. Pflug
> Sent: 14 May 2006 18:50
> To: Tino Wildenhain
> Cc: Kenneth Downs; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
>
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 07:31 -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> > Only runs on Windows though doesn't it?
> >
> > Regards, Dave
> >
> >
> Hardly a limitation since Linux and other Unix based operating systems
> account for a trivial percent of the desktop market. I would guess that
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth
DownsSent: 14 May 2006 23:12To:
pgsql-general@postgresql.orgSubject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI
Interface
gentoo linux on an AMD. here are some stats, if you tell me any
other packages you need
Dave Page wrote:
Wow this is good to know.
I'm also glad to know I'm not the only person this is happening to.
Kenneth; what platform are you running on, and ehich window manager are you using?
Regards, Dave
gentoo linux on an AMD. here are
-Original Message-
From: "Kenneth Downs"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 14/05/06 21:31:15
To: "pgsql-general@postgresql.org"
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
> Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> > However, I figured out that if you press ALT- with being the
&g
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Kenneth Downs schrieb:
Dave Page wrote:
On my linux box, it also has the dubious honor of being the only
program I have ever seen that can lock X hard, with killing the X
server being the only rescue (if you call that a rescue).
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Kenneth Downs schrieb:
Dave Page wrote:
On my linux box, it also has the dubious honor of being the only
program I have ever seen that can lock X hard, with killing the X
server being the only rescue (if you call that a rescue). It can
connect over netwo
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 17:27 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > Why don't you just drop win32 support and leave the commercial
> market
> > to us proprietary coders :-) Seriously, there are now more than
> enough
> > commercial admin tools available to support the PG windows market.
I can't find th
-Original Message-
From: Tony Caduto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 5/13/2006 2:57 PM
To: Dave Page
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
> It's not that derogatory Dave,
> All that page mentions is the weird quirks on win32, I am sure you know
> what those are
Dan Armbrust wrote:
You live in an interesting world... meanwhile, I'm here in the real
world, using Eclipse - the best IDE I've ever used to develop java
applications. Oh, wait, Eclipse is written in Java? I didn't think it
was possible to write good apps in java? Certainly better than visu
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> BTW who was the EXPERT that slammed java performance?
>
> No clue, but java sucks on the desktop :)
>
No it doesn't (unless you mean when tilting your coffee mug. Hmm, no, then you would need
something that actually sucks java).
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Caduto
>
> One example is LimeWire, while it works well, it takes forever to load and
Six seconds on mine.
Best regards,
Jim Wilson
--
Jim Wilson
Kelco Industries
PO Box 160
Milbridge, ME 04658
207-546-7989
---(end of broad
Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You need to read more anti-government rants. I know I ran accross "sheeple"
> at least several years ago. And since it pronounces nicely and the notion
> of people acting like sheep goes back a long way, I expect that term does
> as well.
Google is you
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 16:29:05 -0400,
John DeSoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But mainly I just want to thank the other posters for "junior sales
> sheeple from MS" and "I don't particularly like MacOSX. It seems
> entirely too Charlie and the Chocolate factory for me." Almost spewed
>
Glade
WxDesigner
QT (I forget the name of their forms product)
Oh and if we are sadistic: Kylix.
I hate to say it but none of the above mentioned are in the same class
as Delphi except for Kylix.
Kylix is a bear to deploy but it is still the best IDE of all the ones
you mentioned above, and
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John DeSoi
Sent: 12 May 2006 21:29
To: pgsql general
Cc: Scott Marlowe; Joshua D. Drake
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
But mainly I just want to thank the other posters for
Okay, so I voted and I see Linux leads the pack 16 of 29. I return afew moments later and Linux leads the pack 13 to 24. What gives??
Didn't you read about some part of the websites working on MySQL? Why are you then surprised?tongue-in-cheek,Harald-- GHUM Harald Massapersuadere et programmare
Ha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John DeSoi
> Sent: 12 May 2006 21:29
> To: pgsql general
> Cc: Scott Marlowe; Joshua D. Drake
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> But mainly I just want to
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Caduto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 May 2006 21:24
> To: Dave Page; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> Dave calm downtake a chill pill...
> who said anything about pgAdmin II
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoffrey
> Sent: 12 May 2006 22:18
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> > http://www.postgresql.org
Dave Page wrote:
http://www.postgresql.org/community/
Okay, so I voted and I see Linux leads the pack 16 of 29. I return a
few moments later and Linux leads the pack 13 to 24. What gives??
--
Until later, Geoffrey
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little
security
Tony Caduto wrote:
Dan Armbrust wrote:
You live in an interesting world... meanwhile, I'm here in the real
world, using Eclipse - the best IDE I've ever used to develop java
applications.
Good for you :-) Keep on thinking that
Eclipse is nice, but after using both (eclipse and netbeans) I
Dan Armbrust wrote:
Tony Caduto wrote:
Jim Wilson wrote:
Oh, and to get back on topic a bit more - DBVisualizer is also a nice
database GUI (written in Java, by the way) that is very fast,
responsive, and cross platform.
http://www.minq.se/products/dbvis/
All due respect but I am runni
> -Original Message-
> From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 May 2006 21:45
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Tony Caduto; Jim Wilson; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> Although it certainly isn't fai
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Caduto
Sent: 12 May 2006 20:41
To: Jim Wilson
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
Jim Wilson wrote:
Those Windows developer tools must be
Dan Armbrust wrote:
You live in an interesting world... meanwhile, I'm here in the real
world, using Eclipse - the best IDE I've ever used to develop java
applications.
Good for you :-) Keep on thinking that
Eclipse is nice, but after using both (eclipse and netbeans) I just
liked net bea
I have nothing to offer this highly entertaining thread except I'm
firmly with the camp that thinks getting Unix/Linux developers on
board is the best way to promote a PostgreSQL GUI for all platforms.
Still hoping to do that someday soon.
But mainly I just want to thank the other posters f
Tony Caduto wrote:
Jim Wilson wrote:
Those Windows developer tools must be working really well
How right you are Jim, far superior and more productive than anything
available on
Linux at this time, though the netbeans IDE comes close, to bad Java is
slow for
almost all desktop application
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Page
> Sent: 12 May 2006 21:07
> To: Tony Caduto; Jim Wilson
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
>
>
> > -Or
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Caduto
Sent: 12 May 2006 20:41
To: Jim Wilson
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
Jim Wilson wrote:
Those Windows developer tools must
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Caduto
> Sent: 12 May 2006 20:41
> To: Jim Wilson
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> Jim Wilson wrote:
> >
> >
Jim Wilson wrote:
Those Windows developer tools must be working really well
How right you are Jim, far superior and more productive than anything
available on
Linux at this time, though the netbeans IDE comes close, to bad Java is
slow for
almost all desktop applications.
One example is L
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Caduto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 May 2006 17:17
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> >
> > I'm sure I can arrange an official survey on
&
Z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z
Those Windows developer tools must be working really well since you have the time
to litter my inbox with all these trivial arguments. :-)
BTW who was the EXPERT that slammed java performance?
No clue, but java sucks on the desktop :)
Best regards,
Jim
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I actually use a laptop running XP. I got it for the Win32 port, and
because I use putty/ssh, Mozilla, and Gaim 99% of the time, it doesn't
matter what OS I use. I could install a unix on it, but there seems to
be no need because all my unix work is done on my server via ss
> From: Tony Caduto
>
> Kenneth Downs wrote:
> >
> >
> > I guess it depends on your definition of trivial. Linux represents
> > 100% of the desktops at Secure Data Software. Therefore lightning
> > will be deployed in the trivial percentage of zero.
> > ---(end of broad
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:00:26PM -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >I am not trying to be antagonistic here, but honestly curious as to
> >how you are coming to your conclusions. I have been using
> >PostgreSQL since before it was PostgreSQL and except for Internet
> >Explorer/
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 11:39, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > I am regularly dealing with customers, and specifically developers that
> > > are running Linux+PostgreSQL on the server... but their desktop of
> > > choice is MacOSX.
> >
> > And to follow up on this, I just saw t
Uhmmm your market *IS* developers ;)... You don't actually think my
mom needs your product do you?
Joshua D. Drake
Sorry, I meant Postgresql developers :-) I figured you would have
figured that out since you where talking about Tom :-)
--
Tony Caduto
AM Software Design
http://www.amsoftwa
A.M. wrote:
It would be great if by default postgres used NOTIFY after any schema
changes. Then, listening UIs could be aware of changes behind the scenes
without polling or manual refreshing.
That sounds like a huge misuse of resources.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
-M
---
Tony Caduto wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
I am regularly dealing with customers, and specifically developers
that are running Linux+PostgreSQL on the server... but their desktop
of choice is MacOSX.
And to follow up on this, I just saw that Tom Lane, Buddha guru of
PostgreSQL runs a Powerboo
I am getting my conclusions from the fact that Desktop Linux is just
not popular yet, there are few if any commercial apps being written for it.
Uhh... because they are not needed :)
I run my entire business one Linux. My business is no different then any
other small business. I need:
A
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
I am regularly dealing with customers, and specifically developers
that are running Linux+PostgreSQL on the server... but their desktop
of choice is MacOSX.
And to follow up on this, I just saw that Tom Lane, Buddha guru of
PostgreSQL runs a Powerbook ;)
hate to brea
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
I am not trying to be antagonistic here, but honestly curious as to
how you are coming to your conclusions. I have been using PostgreSQL
since before it was PostgreSQL and except for Internet Explorer/Web
access I can tell you that most do not use Windows to manage Postgr
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 11:39, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I am regularly dealing with customers, and specifically developers that
> > are running Linux+PostgreSQL on the server... but their desktop of
> > choice is MacOSX.
>
> And to follow up on this, I just saw that Tom Lane, Buddha guru of
> P
It would be great if by default postgres used NOTIFY after any schema
changes. Then, listening UIs could be aware of changes behind the scenes
without polling or manual refreshing.
-M
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your f
> I have been using it in windows to manage and manipulate a PostgreSQL
> server running in Linux with limited of success.
>
> The application is EMS PostgreSQL Manager currently $135 directly from
> their site
>
> http://www.pgsqlmanager.com/
Just to complete the list of commercial products.
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
Dave Page wrote:
> Interesting - you've been complaining about the way the 'Enterprise
> Manager' part compares to pgAdmin up until now, not the Query
Analyser.
> Out of interest, what is wrong with our Query Tool? We may well have
> resolv
Dave Page wrote:
Interesting - you've been complaining about the way the 'Enterprise
Manager' part compares to pgAdmin up until now, not the Query Analyser.
Out of interest, what is wrong with our Query Tool? We may well have
resolved many of the issues - for example, 1.6 will have:
I don't
I am regularly dealing with customers, and specifically developers that
are running Linux+PostgreSQL on the server... but their desktop of
choice is MacOSX.
And to follow up on this, I just saw that Tom Lane, Buddha guru of
PostgreSQL runs a Powerbook ;)
I found it interesting because I
That's not exactly true :-)
The market I am going after are those that run windows on the desktop
and access Postgresql running on any server platform.
I would still argue that the vast majority of people access their
Postgresql servers from a Windows Desktop, not a Unix one.
O.k., lets sa
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Tony Caduto wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Only runs on Windows though doesn't it?
Regards, Dave
Hardly a limitation since Linux and other Unix based operating systems
account for a trivial percent of the desktop market. I would guess that
more regular peop
D] On Behalf Of Tony Caduto
Sent: 12 May 2006 17:08
To: Joshua D. Drake; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
It would be interesting to see what the numbers really are,
maybe someone should put up a survey and put a link to it
from the main Postgresql site.
I
Tony Caduto wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
I work in a professional environment in a country (the UK) where the
cost of a 2Mb leased line could buy you a new laptop every month (a
significant amount of money for a small company), and yes, I regularly
use servers on the other side of the world where the
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Caduto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 May 2006 17:14
> To: Dave Page; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> > I've used Enterprise Manager since before I st
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Caduto
Sent: 12 May 2006 17:08
To: Joshua D. Drake; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
It would be interesting to see what the numbers really are
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:07:32AM -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
> It would be interesting to see what the numbers really are, maybe
> someone should put up a survey and put a link to it from the main
> Postgresql site.
I doubt you could lend any credence to the results, but there is a
poll system o
Dave Page wrote:
I've used Enterprise Manager since before I started with pgAdmin II and
I still curse it to this day.
it's all what you are used to I guess :-)
I don't like enterprise manager either, but most of the hardcore MS DBAs
use the Query Analyzer program
which is separate from t
Tony Caduto wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Only runs on Windows though doesn't it?
>>
>> Regards, Dave
>>
>>
> Hardly a limitation since Linux and other Unix based operating systems
> account for a trivial percent of the desktop market. I would guess that
> more regular people (NON FOSS developer
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Caduto
> Sent: 12 May 2006 17:08
> To: Joshua D. Drake; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> It would be interesting to see wha
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Well even more then that. The market that Tony is going after he
*thinks* runs Windows, it doesn't.
The majority of people out there that run PostgreSQL are running *nix.
Yes, the majority of downloads we have received over the past two
years is Windows. However that num
In this case, I'd be willing to bet that there are easily as many linux
desktops accessing PostgreSQL servers as there are Windows desktops, and
that the Mac comes in a distant third to either of them.
[snip]
I agree with everything you had to say Scott, but just FYI I think the
Mac, distan
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Caduto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 May 2006 16:51
> To: Dave Page; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> > I work in a professional environment in a country (the
Dave Page wrote:
query-per-click interface unusable.
And I forgot to mention the remote users working from home via VPN over
a domestic ADSL line with only 256Kb/s upstream at 50:1 contention.
Regards, Dave
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: H
Dave Page wrote:
I work in a professional environment in a country (the UK) where the
cost of a 2Mb leased line could buy you a new laptop every month (a
significant amount of money for a small company), and yes, I regularly
use servers on the other side of the world where the round trip time
etc
And, seriously,
are we still living at a time when connection speed should be
considered a deciding design factor? Yes, some people still
work off of slow connections, but the vast majority of us who
work in a professional environment most definitely do not.
I work in a professional enviro
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 09:39, Tony Caduto wrote:
> Kenneth Downs wrote:
> >
> >
> > I guess it depends on your definition of trivial. Linux represents
> > 100% of the desktops at Secure Data Software. Therefore lightning
> > will be deployed in the trivial percentage of zero.
> > ---
Kenneth Downs wrote:
Tony Caduto wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Only runs on Windows though doesn't it?
Regards, Dave
Hardly a limitation since Linux and other Unix based operating systems
account for a trivial percent of the desktop market.
I guess it depends on your definition of trivia
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Page
> Sent: 12 May 2006 15:46
> To: Erik Jones
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> I work in a professional envir
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 May 2006 15:09
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> Why not have it be an option as to how it loads table info?
It's a f
Dave Page wrote:
Part of the problem is that pgAdmin III seems to preload
object properties instead of pulling them in as you need them.
I have noticed many times in pgAdmin III that when a function
is edited and saved by someone else on a different
workstation I can't see those changes until I
Kenneth Downs wrote:
I guess it depends on your definition of trivial. Linux represents
100% of the desktops at Secure Data Software. Therefore lightning
will be deployed in the trivial percentage of zero.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don'
Tony Caduto wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Only runs on Windows though doesn't it?
Regards, Dave
Hardly a limitation since Linux and other Unix based operating systems
account for a trivial percent of the desktop market.
I guess it depends on your definition of trivial. Linux represents 1
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Caduto
> Sent: 12 May 2006 13:40
> To: Kenneth Downs; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> Part of the problem is that pgAdmin III se
:* Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
The longer you use it, the longer it takes to connect to
databases each time you start up. It says "Restoring previous
settings".
It should only take longer if the number of objects in your database
grows significantly, or if you&#x
Dave Page wrote:
Only runs on Windows though doesn't it?
Regards, Dave
Hardly a limitation since Linux and other Unix based operating systems
account for a trivial percent of the desktop market. I would guess that
more regular people (NON FOSS developers) access Postgresql from a win32
D
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tino
> Wildenhain
> Sent: 12 May 2006 13:19
> To: Kenneth Downs
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> Yes, that seems a g
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth
DownsSent: 12 May 2006 13:06To:
pgsql-general@postgresql.orgSubject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI
Interface
Dave Page wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
