version so the favour of a direct reply in
addition to any sent to this list is requested
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive
.
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E
On Wed, July 25, 2007 03:13, Albe Laurenz wrote:
James B. Byrne wrote:
I would like to verify that the connection between these
two machines is indeed employing ssl for the application in question.
If you set log_min_messages and log_min_error_statement to debug5,
you will get something
to increasing the key size for a host connection from 256 and, if so, how
is this done?
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1
are doing and what programs will be impacted. If set then LC_ALL
overrides all of the individual LC_ settings.
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9
to the user as perfectly sensible text.
Sincerely,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
more, or less, coercive than many other programming
conventions.
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
.sql which pgadmin3 indicates as necessary to enable these
features. yum whatprovides does not provide any useful information
either.
sincerely,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http
to get quick
answers to questions that may be far more involved than I realize.
Sincerely,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905
that I originally had. I was simply wondering
if the built-in sequencer could handle this case or whether I need to roll
my own.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9
is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
---(end
.
Many thanks.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E
***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
---(end of broadcast
is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
---(end of broadcast
the qualifying rows back and the index
would be usable in this case, whereas if the code value came first in the
composite key then the index would be useless for this query.
Have I got this more or less straight?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
guy.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
the
right thing to do.
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
between versions. Surely this is not the case?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
to do this.
Can someone show me how this could be accomplished? And, can someone correct
my use of current_date in the example given above if require?
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited
In-Reply-To: : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:03:14 +0300, Volkan YAZICI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, can you comment on the activity of the OpenSSI project. A project
with a dead main page (see http://openssi.org) doesn't smell good to
me. Are there any alive support in the
to
warrant this approach?
Comments? (not my my sanity, please)
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
;
pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: schema
public already exists
Command was: CREATE SCHEMA public;
WARNING: errors ignored on restore: 2
---
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte
to include it in the GROUP BY clause as well.
Any help is welcomed.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton
that returns every distinct
combination of base, quote, timestamp, and type, then what?
Unless I am missing something then I still have too many rows for
those currencies with more than one type.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn
is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql-general
-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql-general
On Wed, May 20, 2009 13:07, James B. Byrne wrote:
This seems to be working. I had to take a different approach as I
had misapprehended GROUP BY completely.
SELECT *
FROM currency_exchange_rates AS xchg1
WHERE id
IN (
SELECT id
FROM currency_exchange_rates as xchg2
WHERE
1.151300
CAD AUD 2009-05-16 20:40:00 CLSE 1.142100
CAD USD 2009-05-19 20:40:00 CLSE 0.843100
CAD USD 2009-05-19 16:15:00 NOON 0.864400
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte
was doing something out of ignorance that was
notoriously wrong, it seemed best to ask.
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive
Given a datetime column, not null, is there a single syntax that
permits searching for all dates in a given year, year+month, and
year+month+day such that a single parameterised query can handle all
three circumstances?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql
:
pg_config.exe, pg_dump.exe and pg_dumpall.exe but no initdb.exe
anywhere. Is there something about initdb that I do not understand
or some reason why it would not form part of the cygwin
installation?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn
in it.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent
***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general
Found it. The cygwin executables for postgres are installed under
/usr/sbin, which is NOT in the PATH thus the problem, and the
obvious solution.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited
out from that initial point.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561
to recollect, the owner of the development and test
databases had dbcreate privileges.
If the problem persists under the cygwin environment then I will
revisit the native pg installation for testing.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn
***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org
effective_from
timestamp without time zone;
ALTER TABLE currency_exchange_rates ALTER COLUMN effective_from SET
STORAGE PLAIN;
ALTER TABLE currency_exchange_rates ALTER COLUMN effective_from SET
NOT NULL;
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
On Tue, June 30, 2009 14:07, Tom Lane wrote:
It's the eight-digit year field that it's unhappy with ...
Duuuh! I suppose that it would...
Thanks,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited
a nudge in the right direction. This issue at least has
no overlong dates.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561
B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org
***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general
is going on.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
this result reports that there are
no rows returned. So where did they go?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
log, which seems congruent with the one ROLLBACK
just before the very end.
Evidently, all this test processing takes place within a single,
never completed, transaction.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte
there are no rows. That is the problem. The question
begging an answer is: where are the rows added in the immediately
previous INSERTS?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte
necessary to clarify that LOCATION lines correspond
to the LOG/NOTICE/WARNING/ERROR line immediately _above_ it, not
the one below.
So noted, with thanks.
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne
to a numeric expression such
as the one above?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
much further into your
project.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1
://www.cs.arizona.edu/~mccann/research/divpresentation.pdf
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton
that is
fine with me.
Thanks,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561
based user ACLs is
sufficient.
I really want to get a sense of how prevalent using GRANT
PRIVILEGE, beyond the minimum required, is. And this
seems like a very good place to discover it. Again, please
reply off-list if you wish.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B
On Fri, December 9, 2011 12:13, James B. Byrne wrote:
Just to clarify the question. What I am asking basically
comes down to if separate user ids are added for most
individuals that access the database or not.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
are likely to be using five
years from now I am soliciting informed option over which
option is considered a better choice for the long term.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http
in his inbox.
Does anyone here know if there is reason why CentOS-5 has
the i386 package built for pgadmin3 v1.14.1 but not the
x86_64? Or does it exist and I am simply not finding it?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte
syntax for type bytea
CONTEXT: COPY wiki_content_versions, line 1, column data:
\x68312e205b5b57696b6953746172747c48617274652026204c796e65204c696d697465642053746172745d5d0d0a0d0a0d...
WARNING: errors ignored on restore: 4
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
-1.14.0-3.rhel5.i86_64 or why it is not
available from pgdgrpm.org?
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
On Tue, January 10, 2012 09:28, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 6:17:27 am James B. Byrne
wrote:
My question: Is their a way to specify a pg_dump option
to retain compatibility with a lower version pg
database?
Alternatively, can one install a higher level pg_dump
channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql
On: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:33:01 -0800, Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, February 24, 2012 7:16:47 am James B. Byrne
wrote:
CentOS-5.7
RoR-3.1.1
Pg-9.1
I am trying to run a test suite against Pg-9.1 for a
RoR-3.1.1 based application. When I run the test DB
setup task
On Mon, February 27, 2012 13:54, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 02/27/2012 08:51 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
The options seem to be run the script as the owner of
the
plpgsql EXTENSION or do not include the comment.
How does one instruct pg_dump not to include the COMMENT
for the plpgsql extension
On Mon, February 27, 2012 14:30, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 02/27/2012 08:51 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
The options seem to be run the script as the owner of
the
plpgsql EXTENSION or do not include the comment.
How does one instruct pg_dump not to include the COMMENT
for the plpgsql
On Mon, February 27, 2012 15:44, Tom Lane wrote:
James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca writes:
1. Can the comments be suppressed?
No.
2. Why is this an error in the first place?
Because you're not running the script as superuser.
regards, tom lane
Why
So, as I am unfamiliar with the EXTENSION syntax, what is
wrong with the preceding statement? What is the correct
syntax?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
;
So, why is the plpgsql extension in test owned by postgres
and not by devl to begin with?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox
On Mon, February 27, 2012 16:37, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On Monday, February 27, 2012 1:23:22 pm James B. Byrne
wrote:
Obviously, I am missing something important here. The
database in question is created thusly:
CREATE DATABASE test
WITH OWNER = devl
ENCODING = 'UTF8
| UTF8 |
| | |
(5 rows)
Collation, C-Type and Access Privileges columns removed.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http
.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via
EXTENSION plpgsql OWNER TO devl;
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1
On Tue, February 28, 2012 12:52, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 02/28/2012 09:50 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
Sigh. I will have to think on this before changing
anything.
To my mind, the most straight-forward way of dealing
with
this is to remove the language from template1
altogether
.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql
as expected.
By the way. Thank you very much for your assistance with
this. It is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley
by the pg_dump file
because of the ownership of the extension which triggered
this entire discussion.
I have removed plpgsql from template1 on all the systems
affected. The tests now run against 9.1 fine.
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via
***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general
On Thu, November 25, 2010 21:58, Robert Treat wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:21 PM, James B. Byrne
byrn...@harte-lyne.cawrote:
Looks to me like the problem is you are trying to ORDER BY columns
in
ca_customs_entry, but there is no such table for that (don't
confuse
==
allow postgresql_t var_lib_t:dir rmdir;
allow postgresql_t var_lib_t:file { write getattr link read unlink
append };
Is this to be expected?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited
I am doing wrong?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
?
regards, tom lane
I tried a restorecon as suggested by sealert at the first error. It
had no effect insofar as I could determine.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http
On Wed, December 1, 2010 16:54, Tom Lane wrote:
James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca writes:
Earlier today I attempted to upgrade a production server from 8.1
to
8.4 using the pgdg-84-centos.repo. I say attempted because I
could
never get it to support ssl connections
again. If there was just something odd about the SELinux contexts
on that particular host then that should clear it up. I will report
whichever way it goes thereafter.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte
and column layouts in the new database.
Is there a way to load the data dumped from a single table in one
database into a new, possibly differently named, table in a
different database, using PG utilities?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql
On Thu, December 2, 2010 15:32, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, December 2, 2010 15:23, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
AFAIK, the Red Hat RPMs work out-of-the-box with SELinux;
They should -- we are using the same routines for initdb'ing.
I will do
On Wed, December 1, 2010 16:54, Tom Lane wrote:
James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca writes:
Earlier today I attempted to upgrade a production server
from 8.1 to 8.4 using the pgdg-84-centos.repo. I say
attempted because I could never get it to support ssl
connections
On Sat, December 4, 2010 01:11, Tom Lane wrote:
James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca writes:
I wrote too soon. What I did was uncomment the ssl option. I
neglected to change the setting from off to on.
When I try to start the server with ssl=on it fails with this
error:
Auto
the server no longer causes any error.
Than you all for the help.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton
On Mon, December 6, 2010 13:29, James B. Byrne wrote:
The problem was an expired pki certificate. When we first used ssl
for pg we did not have our private CA set up. So we generated a
self-signed certificate. That certificate expired this past July
and I infer that while 8.1 did
installed
Might there be a problem between the server being compiled for i386
and openssl for i686? I cannot for the life of me determine what
configuration problem causes this error.
On Fri, December 3, 2010 16:04, James B. Byrne wrote:
When I try to start the server with ssl
presently get makes no sense at all to
me.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax
with ssl enabled.
Many thanks for the hints and suggestions. They did in fact
eventually point me in the right direction.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9
whatever, remains owned by the
original owner. Is there no way to change the owner everywhere in
the cloned database using cretedb? Or am I constrained to do a dump
all and restore?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte
it it did
seem a bit convoluted. The REASSIGN OWNED BY seems the more
sensible approach.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905
with PostgreSQL?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E
person to require this sort of thing of SQL so if anyone can
point me to a reference that explicitly sets out how to accomplish
this I would greatly appreciate it.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne
like DISTINCT ON. I take it
that this syntax is peculiar to PostgreSQL?:
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general
channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql
up elsewhere and, if so, how is
it handled?
Sincerely,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo