hi,
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 16:15 -0800, Ken Tanzer wrote:
> Hi. Thanks so much for your assistance. This is definitely getting
> the results I was looking for. It is still syntacticallly more
> cumbersome than I might have hoped, but I can work with it. So I've
> got two follow questions/issue
Hi. Thanks so much for your assistance. This is definitely getting the
results I was looking for. It is still syntacticallly more cumbersome than
I might have hoped, but I can work with it. So I've got two follow
questions/issues:
1) I can see there are many, more complex, options for aggrega
hello,
one more fix, to not let someone get incorrect/incomplete ideas, see
below
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 10:03 +0100, mariusz wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 18:11 -0800, Ken Tanzer wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:10 AM,
> > mariusz wrote:
> >
> >
> >
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 10:03 +0100, mariusz wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 18:11 -0800, Ken Tanzer wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:10 AM,
> > mariusz wrote:
> >
> >
> > i guess, you can easily get max continuous range for each row
> > with
>
On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 18:11 -0800, Ken Tanzer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:10 AM,
> mariusz wrote:
>
>
> i guess, you can easily get max continuous range for each row
> with
> something like this:
>
> CREATE OR REPLA
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:10 AM, mariusz wrote:
> i guess, you can easily get max continuous range for each row with
> something like this:
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION
> append_daterange(d1 daterange, d2 daterange)
> RETURNS daterange
> LANGUAGE sql
> AS
>
