On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 5:29 PM Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> While going through the code I noticed that the nTapes member in
> SharedSort is unused. This is just initialized with nworkers but
> never used. The attached patch removes this variable.
>
We could have used that variable for an assert
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 1:55 PM Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 8:26 PM Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 7:58 PM Erik Rijkers wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2020-11-14 12:53, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 6:07 PM Alexander Korotkov
> > > >
I wrote:
> Not sure if you noticed, but piculet has twice failed the
> 007_standby_source.pl test that was added by 9c4f5192f:
> ...
> Now, I'm not sure what to make of that, but I can't help noticing that
> piculet uses --disable-atomics while francolin uses --disable-spinlocks.
> That leads the
Not sure if you noticed, but piculet has twice failed the
007_standby_source.pl test that was added by 9c4f5192f:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=piculet=2020-11-15%2006%3A00%3A11
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=piculet=2020-11-13%2011%3A20%3A10
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 3:18 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 3:10 PM Dilip Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:20 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 2:25 PM Dilip Kumar wrote:
> >
> > > 3. Can you please prepare a separate patch for test case
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 8:26 PM Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 7:58 PM Erik Rijkers wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-11-14 12:53, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 6:07 PM Alexander Korotkov
> > > >
> >
> > >Note that those indexes may not be as afficient as regulat
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 11:24 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 6:02 PM Antonin Houska wrote:
> >
> > Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 2:45 PM Antonin Houska wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > No background undo
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Reduced
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 6:02 PM Antonin Houska wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 2:45 PM Antonin Houska wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > No background undo
> > > --
> > >
> > > Reduced complexity of the patch seems to be the priority at the moment.
> > > Amit
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:42 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think the big problem, and I have seen this repeatedly, is showing up
> with a patch without discussing whether people actually want the
> feature. I know it is a doc issue, but our TODO list has the order as:
>
> Desirability ->
15.11.2020 04:11, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 01:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>> As noted in [1], a sensible solution would be putting the same "retry on
>> ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED" action in a wrapper for stat().
>> And bed90759f brought in master the _pgstat64()
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 01:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> As noted in [1], a sensible solution would be putting the same "retry on
> ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED" action in a wrapper for stat().
> And bed90759f brought in master the _pgstat64() function, where such
> error handling should be
"osumi.takami...@fujitsu.com" writes:
> [ CREATE_OR_REPLACE_TRIGGER_v18.patch ]
Pushed with some mostly-minor cleanup.
(I know this has been a very long slog. Congratulations for
seeing it through.)
regards, tom lane
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 7:58 PM Erik Rijkers wrote:
>
> On 2020-11-14 12:53, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 6:07 PM Alexander Korotkov
> > >
>
> >Note that those indexes may not be as afficient as regulat B-tree
> > indexes
> >for equality operator.
>
>
> 'afficient as
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 9:01 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> I am trying to run a few benchmarks measuring the effects of patch to
> make GetSnapshotData() faster in the face of larger numbers of
> established connections.
>
> Before the patch connection establishment often is very slow due to
>
Hello Marina,
1) It looks like pgbench will no longer support Windows XP due to the
function DeleteSynchronizationBarrier. From
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/synchapi/nf-synchapi-deletesynchronizationbarrier
Minimum supported client: Windows 8 [desktop apps only]
Minimum
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I adapted the test code to our code style. I also removed the "timings"
> stuff; I think that's something better left to pgbench.
>
> (I haven't looked at Daniel's pgbench stuff yet, but I will do that
> next.)
The patch I posted in [1] was pretty simple, but at
Hello!
On 2020-11-13 08:44, kuroda.hay...@fujitsu.com wrote:
Dear Fabien,
and this will wait till its time comes. In the mean time, I think that
you
should put the patch status as you see fit, independently of the other
patch: it seems unlikely that they would be committed together, and
On 2020-11-14 12:53, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 6:07 PM Alexander Korotkov
>
Note that those indexes may not be as afficient as regulat B-tree
indexes
for equality operator.
'afficient as regulat' should be
'efficient as regular'
Sorry to be nitpicking - it's
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 6:07 PM Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> Hi, Erik!
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 11:37 AM Erik Rijkers wrote:
> > On 2020-11-14 06:30, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> >
> > > [v4-0001-Handle-equality...in-contrib-pg_trgm.patch (~]
> > >
> > > I'm going to push this if no
Hi, Erik!
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 11:37 AM Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2020-11-14 06:30, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> > [v4-0001-Handle-equality...in-contrib-pg_trgm.patch (~]
> >
> > I'm going to push this if no objections.
> >
>
> About the sgml, in doc/src/sgml/pgtrgm.sgml :
>
>
> Beginning in
Hello hackers,
After fixing bug #16161 (pg_ctl inability to open just deleted
postmaster.pid) there are still some errors related to the same
Windows-only issue.
Namely, pg_upgradeCheck failures seen on
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=fairywren=REL_13_STABLE
Here
On 2020-08-03 19:44, Wolfgang Walther wrote:
So given this:
SELECT x.id FROM a LEFT JOIN b USING (id) AS x
will this return NULL or a.id for rows that don't match in b? This
should definitely be mentioned in the docs and I guess a test wouldn't
be too bad as well?
This issue is independent
On 2020-11-10 16:15, Georgios Kokolatos wrote:
I noticed that this patch fails on the cfbot.
For this, I changed the status to: 'Waiting on Author'.
Cheers,
//Georgios
The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
Here is a rebased and lightly retouched patch.
--
Peter Eisentraut
On 2020-11-14 06:30, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
[v4-0001-Handle-equality...in-contrib-pg_trgm.patch (~]
I'm going to push this if no objections.
About the sgml, in doc/src/sgml/pgtrgm.sgml :
Beginning in PostgreSQL 14, these indexes
also support equality operator (simple comparison
24 matches
Mail list logo
