On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 04:03:03PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> It would also require to bring HbaLine->sourcefile. I'm afraid it would be
> weird to introduce such a refactoring in a separate commit just to pass a
> constant down multiple level of indirection, as all the macro will remain
> spe
FYI - After a recent push, the v40-0001 patch no longer applies on the
latest HEAD.
[postgres@CentOS7-x64 oss_postgres_misc]$ git apply
../patches_misc/v40-0001-Perform-streaming-logical-transactions-by-parall.patch
error: patch failed: src/backend/replication/logical/launcher.c:54
error: src/back
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 9:48 AM Richard Guo wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:05 AM John Naylor
wrote:
>>
>> It's perfectly clear and simple now, even if it doesn't win at "code
golf".
>
>
> Agree with your point. Do you think we can further make the one-line
> function a macro or an inlin
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 4:09 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 02:43:43PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > This is essentially the same as before except now, utilizing the
> > GUC_DEFAULT_COMPILE flag added by Justin's patch [1], the sanity-check
> > skips over any dynamic compile
On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 12:01, Richard Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:46 AM Japin Li wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 11:07, Zhihong Yu wrote:
>> > Please take a look at patch v2.
>>
>> Maybe we should define those functions in headers. See patch v3.
>
>
> Yes, putting them in .h
Hi all,
As mentioned in [1], there is no regression tests for the SQL control
functions: pg_control_checkpoint, pg_control_recovery,
pg_control_system and pg_control_init.
It would be minimal to check their execution, as of a "SELECT FROM
func()", still some validation can be done on its output a
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 02:27:07PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have looked at that, and the attribute mapping remains compatible
> with past versions once the appropriate pg_proc entries are added.
> The updated patch set attached does that (with a user() function as
> well to keep the code a
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 02:43:43PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> This is essentially the same as before except now, utilizing the
> GUC_DEFAULT_COMPILE flag added by Justin's patch [1], the sanity-check
> skips over any dynamic compiler-dependent GUCs.
Yeah, this is a self-reminder that I should try
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 02:22:16PM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I confess I don't understand why is it important that XLogBeginInsert is
>> called inside the critical section. It seems to me that that part is
>> only a side-effect of having to acquire the buffer locks
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 02:22:16PM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I suppose it's a matter of whether any bugs are possible outside of
> Neon. If yes, then definitely this should be backpatched. Offhand, I
> don't see any. On the other hand, even if no bugs are known, then it's
> still valuable t
I pushed the bug fixes from this series, without their accompanying
tests. Here's a rebase of the test suite, with all those tests now
squashed into the main test patch, and also the
tell-Windows-to-be-more-like-Unix patch. Registered in the
commitfest.
From 1b70db7f4068df22b29e02d0c1b759195e0187
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:46 AM Japin Li wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 11:07, Zhihong Yu wrote:
> > Please take a look at patch v2.
>
> Maybe we should define those functions in headers. See patch v3.
Yes, putting them in .h file is better to me. For the v3 patch, we can
do the same one-
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 9:05 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 05:29:58PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > At Sat, 17 Sep 2022 23:53:07 -0500, Justin Pryzby
> > wrote in
...
> Rebased the patch.
>
> I also split the flag into DEFAULTS_COMPILE and DEFAULTS_INITDB, since
> th
On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 11:07, Zhihong Yu wrote:
> Please take a look at patch v2.
Maybe we should define those functions in headers. See patch v3.
--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c b/src/backend/optimize
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 6:52 PM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:16 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:56:58AM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > > Patch 0002 adds a sanity-check function called by
> > > InitializeGUCOptions, as suggested by Tom [2]. This is to
The AssignTransactionId has the following comments:
/*
* ensure this test matches similar one in
* RecoverPreparedTransactions()
*/
if (nUnreportedXids >= PGPROC_MAX_CACHED_SUBXIDS ||
log_unknown_top)
{
...
}
Howe
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 12:30, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 04:06:51PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > I noticed that the tab completion for ALTER STATISTICS .. SET was not
> > handled. The attached patch displays SCHEMA and STATISTICS for tab
> > completion of ALTER STATISTICS na
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 6:32 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, October 20, 2022 5:49 PM Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 2:08 PM Peter Smith
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > 7. get_transaction_apply_action
> > >
> > > > 12. get_transaction_apply_action
> > > >
> > > > I st
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 7:58 PM Japin Li wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 10:48, Richard Guo wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:05 AM John Naylor <
> john.nay...@enterprisedb.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:19 AM Zhihong Yu wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> > When I was
On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 10:48, Richard Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:05 AM John Naylor
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:19 AM Zhihong Yu wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > When I was looking at src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c, I found
>> a typo in one of the comments.
>>
>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:05 AM John Naylor
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:19 AM Zhihong Yu wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > When I was looking at src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c, I found
> a typo in one of the comments.
>
> Using "t" as an abbreviation for "true" was probably intentiona
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 6:59 PM Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> On 2022-Oct-19, Richard Guo wrote:
>
> > Hi hackers,
> >
> > I happened to notice $subject. Attach a trivial patch for that.
>
> Thanks, applied. I did change the comment atop setTargetTable, which I
> thought could use a little bit more de
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 6:01 PM Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> On 2022-Oct-24, Richard Guo wrote:
> > ISTM the savepointLevel always remains the same as what is in
> > TopTransactionStateData after looking at the codes. Now I also get
> > confused. Maybe what we want is nestingLevel?
>
> This has alread
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:19 AM Zhihong Yu wrote:
>
> Hi,
> When I was looking at src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c, I found
a typo in one of the comments.
Using "t" as an abbreviation for "true" was probably intentional, so not a
typo. There is no doubt what the behavior is.
> I also t
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:55:53PM -0500, David Christensen wrote:
>
> Explicitly
> locking (assuming you stay in your lane) should only need to guard
> against access from other
> backends of this type if using shared buffers, so will be use-case dependent.
I'm not sure what you mean here?
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> On 2022-Oct-24, Finnerty, Jim wrote:
>> The advantage of hash partition bounds is that they are not
>> domain-specific, as they are for ordinary RANGE partitions, but they
>> are more flexible than MODULUS/REMAINDER partition bounds.
I'm more than a bit skeptical of that
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 11:39:19AM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Reading it again, I agree with your conclusion, so I'll push as you
> proposed with some extra tests, after they complete running.
Thanks for the fix, Álvaro!
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 9:14 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 02:54:39AM -0700, tho...@habets.se wrote:
> > And you say for complex setups. Fair enough. But currently I'd say the
> > default is wrong, and what should be default is not configurable.
>
> Agreed, I think this needs mu
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 3:02 PM Anton A. Melnikov
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Please, could somebody explain what the "compound" queries were created
> for?
> Maybe i'm calling them wrong. It's about queries like:
> SELECT 1 + 2 \; SELECT 2.0 AS "float" \; SELECT 1;
>
> Such queries can neither be prepa
Thanks so much for the answers, I'll try to start looking at some patches.
--
Matheus Alcantara
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 05:29:58PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Sat, 17 Sep 2022 23:53:07 -0500, Justin Pryzby
> wrote in
> > This is an alternative implementation, which still relies on adding the
> > GUC_DYNAMIC, flag but doesn't require adding a new, sql-accessible
> > function to con
Hello!
Please, could somebody explain what the "compound" queries were created for?
Maybe i'm calling them wrong. It's about queries like:
SELECT 1 + 2 \; SELECT 2.0 AS "float" \; SELECT 1;
Such queries can neither be prepared nor used in the extended protocol with
ERROR: cannot insert multip
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 6:35 PM Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 12:27 PM Melanie Plageman
> wrote:
> >
> > v34 is attached.
> > I think the column names need discussion. Also, the docs need more work
> > (I added a lot of new content there). I could use feedback on the column
>
Hi,
Aleksander, thanks for the discussion! It seems to me that I have to add
some parts
of it to API documentation, to clarify the details on API purpose and
use-cases.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 6:37 PM Aleksander Alekseev <
aleksan...@timescale.com> wrote:
> Hi Nikita,
>
> > > > TOAST implementat
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 1:31 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> - we shouldn't do pgstat_count_io_op() while the buffer header lock is held,
> if possible.
I've changed this locally. It will be fixed in the next version I share.
>
> I wonder if we should add a "source" output argument to
>
Hi,
When I was looking at src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c, I found a
typo in one of the comments.
I also took the chance to simplify the code a little bit.
Please take a look at the patch.
Thanks
is-or.patch
Description: Binary data
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 11:02 AM Simon Riggs
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 at 02:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 05:46:55PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 3:51 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Attached is the merged patch from all the great comm
On 2022-Oct-24, Finnerty, Jim wrote:
> Is there a reason why HASH partitioning does not currently support
> range partition bounds, where the values in the partition bounds would
> refer to the hashed value?
Just lack of an implementation, I suppose.
> The advantage of hash partition bounds is t
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 8:43 AM Jeff Davis wrote:
> > Even if regular/early autovacuum had just one
> > opportunity to run to completion, we'd already be much better off.
>
> By "opportunity", you mean that, regardless of configuration, the
> cancellable autovacuum would at least start; though it
On Mon, 2022-10-24 at 07:25 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> The really important thing is giving a regular/early autocancellable
> autovacuum triggered by age(relfrozenxid) *some* opportunity to run.
+1. That principle seems both reasonable from a system standpoint and
understandable to a user.
>
Hi Nikita,
> > > TOAST implementation is not necessary for Table AM.
>
> >What other use cases for TOAST do you have in mind?
>
> The main use case is the same as for the TOAST mechanism - storing and
> retrieving
> oversized data. But we expanded this case with some details -
> - update TOASTed
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 7:56 AM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I don't understand what you mean. FreezeLimit *isn't* always exactly
> 50 million XIDs before OldestXmin -- not anymore. In fact that's the
> main benefit of this work (commit c3ffa731). That detail has changed
> (and changed for the better)
Hello Reid,
could you rebase the patch again? It doesn't apply currently
(http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_40_3867.log). Thanks!
You mention, that you want to prevent the compiler from getting cute.
I don't think this comments are exactly helpful in the current state. I think
probably fine to
Hello,
When studying the weird planner issue reported here [1], I came up with
the attached patch. It reduces the probability of calling
get_actual_variable_range().
The patch applies to the master branch.
How to test :
CREATE TABLE foo (a bigint, b TEXT) WITH (autovacuum_enabled = off);
IN
On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 at 02:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 05:46:55PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 3:51 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Attached is the merged patch from all the great comments I received. I
> > > have also rebuilt the docs with the upd
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:18 AM Anton A. Melnikov wrote:
> > Also, the proposed new WARNING is only seen when we're
> > bound to also see the existing OldestXmin WARNING already. Why have 2
> > WARNINGs about exactly the same problem?>
>
> I didn't understand this moment.
>
> If the FreezeLimit is
Hi!
>From personal experience with the project I have serious doubts this
>is going to happen. Before such invasive changes are going to be
>accepted there should be a clear understanding of how exactly TOASTers
>are supposed to be used. This should be part of the documentation in
>the patchset. A
Is there a reason why HASH partitioning does not currently support range
partition bounds, where the values in the partition bounds would refer to the
hashed value?
The advantage of hash partition bounds is that they are not domain-specific,
as they are for ordinary RANGE partitions, but they
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 9:32 PM Jeff Davis wrote:
> It's possible this would be easier for users to understand: one process
> that does cleanup work over time in a way that minimizes interference;
> and another process that activates in more urgent situations (perhaps
> due to misconfiguration of
Hi Nikita,
> Using Table AM Routine and routing AM methods calls via it is a topic for
> further discussion,
> if Pluggable TOAST will be committed. [...] And even then it would be an open
> issue.
>From personal experience with the project I have serious doubts this
is going to happen. Before
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 09:44:18PM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> Recently I have been working a lot with partitioned tables which contain a mix
> of local and foreign partitions, and find it would be very useful to be able
> to
> easily obtain an overview of which partitions are foreign and
Hi,
>This is exactly the point. In order to not to create a silver bullet,
>TOASTers should be limited to a single TableAM. The one we know uses
>pages of a known fixed size, the one that actually requires TOAST
>because pages are relatively small, etc.
Currently all our TOAST implementations use
Hi
Recently I have been working a lot with partitioned tables which contain a mix
of local and foreign partitions, and find it would be very useful to be able to
easily obtain an overview of which partitions are foreign and where they are
located.
Currently, executing "\d+" on a partitioned table
On 2022-Oct-13, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 08:54:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Don't we need to back-patch these fixes?
>
> I guess I should, though I have finished by not doing due to the
> unlikeliness of the problem, where we would need the combination of a
> page evict
On 10/24/22 06:32, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 02:33:50PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> Of course, if there are e.g. BTREE indexes this is going to be slower,
>> but people are unlikely to have both index types on the same column.
>
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 05:48:31PM +0200,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 11:41 AM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> Here are my review comments for v40-0001.
>
> ==
>
> src/backend/replication/logical/worker.c
>
>
> 1. should_apply_changes_for_rel
>
> + else if (am_parallel_apply_worker())
> + {
> + if (rel->state != SUBREL_STATE_READY)
> + ereport(ERR
Hi Nikita,
> >I don't argue with most of what you say. I am just pointing out the
> >reason why the chosen approach "N TOASTers x M TableAMs" will not
> >work:
>
> We assume that TAM used in custom Toaster works as it is should work,
> and leave TAM internals to this TAM developer - say, we do not
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 3:04 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 5:52 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 2:00 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > >
> > > About your point that having different partition structures for
> > > publisher and subscriber, I don't know how com
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 3:02 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
Few comments on the 0001 and 0003 patches:
v40-0001*
==
1.
+ /*
+ * The queue used to transfer messages from the parallel apply worker to
+ * the leader apply worker.
+ */
+ shm_mq_handle *error_mq_handle;
Shall we say erro
On 2022-Oct-20, Runqi Tian wrote:
> My question regarding subcommand is actually on commands other than
> ALTER TABLE. Let me give an example (You can also find this example in
> the patch), when command like
>
> CREATE SCHEMA element_test CREATE TABLE foo (id int)
>
> is caught by ddl_command_e
Hi!
>I don't argue with most of what you say. I am just pointing out the
>reason why the chosen approach "N TOASTers x M TableAMs" will not
>work:
We assume that TAM used in custom Toaster works as it is should work,
and leave TAM internals to this TAM developer - say, we do not want to
change in
Hi,
> > +
> > + on_failure:
> > +<<: *on_failure_meson
> > +cores_script: |
> > + %BASH_EXE% -lc "cd build src/tools/ci/cores_backtrace.sh msys
> build/tmp_install"
> > +
>
> This is wrong - it should just archive the same files that the current
> windows
> task does.
>
Changed it
On 2022-Oct-24, Japin Li wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 17:56, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Now that we have transaction-controlling procedures, I think the next
> > step is to add the SQL-standard feature that allows savepoint level
> > control for them, which would make the savepointLevel no lon
On 2022-Oct-19, Richard Guo wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> I happened to notice $subject. Attach a trivial patch for that.
Thanks, applied. I did change the comment atop setTargetTable, which I
thought could use a little bit more detail on what is happening, and
also in its callsite in transformMerge
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 17:56, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> This has already been discussed:
> https://postgr.es/m/1317297307-sup-7...@alvh.no-ip.org
Sorry for my lazy search.
> Now that we have transaction-controlling procedures, I think the next
> step is to add the SQL-standard feature that allow
Hi,
On 10/24/22 5:34 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 02:10:37PM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
On 10/21/22 2:58 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
I have spent a couple of hours doing a pass over v2, playing manually
with regex patterns, reloads, the system views and item lists.
On 2022-Oct-24, Richard Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 3:00 PM Japin Li wrote:
>
> > I try to remove the savepointLevel, and it seems harmless. Any thoughts?
>
> ISTM the savepointLevel always remains the same as what is in
> TopTransactionStateData after looking at the codes. Now I also
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 1:55 AM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-10-11 10:21:17 +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 5:31 AM David Rowley
wrote:
> > >
> > > The proposed patches in [1] do aim to make additional usages of the
> > > slab allocator, and I have a feeling that
Avoid having to list all the possible object types twice. Instead, only
_getObjectDescription() needs to know about specific object types. It
communicates back to _printTocEntry() whether an owner is to be set.
In passing, remove the logic to use ALTER TABLE to set the owner of
views and seq
On 2022-Oct-24, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On the contrary, it seems to me that putting the assertion within the
> if() block makes the assertion weaker, because we would never check
> for an incorrect state after do_pg_abort_backup() is registered (aka
> any pg_backup_start() call) when not enterin
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 3:00 PM Japin Li wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 12:19, Japin Li wrote:
> > The TransactionStateData has savepointLevel field, however, I do not
> understand
> > what is savepoint level, it seems all savepoints have the same
> savepointLevel,
> > I want to know how the sa
Hi Nikita,
I don't argue with most of what you say. I am just pointing out the
reason why the chosen approach "N TOASTers x M TableAMs" will not
work:
> Don't you think that this is an arguable design decision? Basically
> all we know about the underlying TableAM is that it stores tuples
> _someh
Hello!
On 18.10.2022 20:56, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
The term "removable cutoff" is how VACUUM VERBOSE reports OldestXmin.
I think that it's good to use the same terminology here.
Thanks for the explanation! Firstly exactly this term confused me.
Sure, the same terminology makes all easier to
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 04:13:51PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 01:33:12PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > v12 attached, fixing multiple conflicts with recent activity.
>
> typedef struct TokenizedAuthLine
> {
> List *fields; /* List of lists of
Hi hackers.
There is a docs Logical Replication section "31.10 Configuration
Settings" [1] which describes some logical replication GUCs, and
details on how they interact with each other and how to take that into
account when setting their values.
There is another docs Server Configuration sectio
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 09:07:04PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> XLogBackupResetRunning() seemed better. +1 for above function names.
I see what you are doing here. XLogCtl would still live in xlog.c,
but we want to have functions that are able to manipulate some of its
fields. I am not sure
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 01:33:12PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> v12 attached, fixing multiple conflicts with recent activity.
typedef struct TokenizedAuthLine
{
List *fields; /* List of lists of AuthTokens */
+ char *file_name; /* File name *
Hmm. While putting
On 10/24/22 03:01, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?Q?Fr=c3=a9d=c3=a9ric_Yhuel?= writes:
When using pg_dump (or pg_restore) with option "--clean", there is some
SQL code to drop every objects at the beginning.
Yup ...
The DROP statement for a view involving circular dependencies is :
CREATE OR REPLA
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 04:06:51PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> I noticed that the tab completion for ALTER STATISTICS .. SET was not
> handled. The attached patch displays SCHEMA and STATISTICS for tab
> completion of ALTER STATISTICS name SET.
Indeed, it is a bit strange as we would get a list of s
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 12:19, Japin Li wrote:
> Hi, hackers
>
> The TransactionStateData has savepointLevel field, however, I do not
> understand
> what is savepoint level, it seems all savepoints have the same savepointLevel,
> I want to know how the savepoint level changes.
I try to remove th
80 matches
Mail list logo
