On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 4:11 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> Speaking of the developer-only status, I find the io_direct name more enticing
> than force_parallel_mode, which PostgreSQL renamed due to overuse from people
> expecting non-developer benefits. Should this have a name starting with
> debug_?
H
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:19:39AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I read through this again and found a comment that needed to be
> updated, so I did that, bumped catversion, and committed this.
[commit e3ce2de]
> @@ -4735,8 +4735,8 @@ initialize_acl(void)
>
> /*
>* I
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 8:54 PM John Naylor
wrote:
> I've done a more careful read-through, but I'll need a couple more, I imagine.
Yeah, it's tough to get this stuff right.
> I'll first point out some things I appreciate, and I'm glad are taken care of
> as part of this work:
>
> - Pushing the
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 12:06:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 2:19 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I get the impression that we are going to need an actual runtime
> >> test if we want to defend against this. Not entirely convinced
> >> it's worth the troubl
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 12:58 AM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> [v2]
I've done a more careful read-through, but I'll need a couple more, I
imagine.
I'll first point out some things I appreciate, and I'm glad are taken care
of as part of this work:
- Pushing the talk of scheduled manual vacuums to t
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 4:15 AM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 1:09 AM John Naylor
> wrote:
> > I made some small changes and wrote a suitably comprehensive commit
message. I separated the possible uses for single-user mode into a separate
paragraph in the "Note:" , moved the
Hello,
On 28/04/2023 09:08, Denis Laxalde wrote:
Michael Paquier a écrit :
Speaking of which, what was the performance impact of your application
once PQflush() was moved out of the pipeline sync? Just asking for
curiosity..
I have no metrics for that; but maybe Anton has some?
I did a quick
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 1:17 AM John Naylor
wrote:
> > Although I didn't mention the issue with single user mode in my
> > introductory email (the situation there is just appalling IMV), it
> > seems like I might not be able to ignore that problem while I'm
> > working on this patch. Declaring tha
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 1:09 AM John Naylor
wrote:
> Looks good to me.
I'm strongly in favor of this. It's most unfortunate that it took this long.
> I've just made some small edits for v7 and wrote a commit message to explain
> how we got here. This can be backpatched all the way, as it's simp
Hello,
On 28/04/2023 13:06, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 6:39 PM Anton Kirilov wrote:
I have attached a patch that introduces PQsendSyncMessage()...
I wonder whether this is the naming that we want. The two names are
significantly different. Something like PQpipelineSendSync()
I had noticed that performance wasn't great when using the @> or <@
operators when examining if an element is contained in a range.
Based on the discussion in [1] I would like to suggest the following
changes:
This patch attempts to improve the row estimation, as well as opening
the possibilit
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 12:58 AM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 12:16 AM John Naylor
> wrote:
> > Now is a great time to revise this section, in my view. (I myself am
about ready to get back to testing and writing for the task of removing
that "obnoxious hint".)
>
> Although I
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 8:08 PM Aleksander Alekseev
wrote:
> [v6]
0001:
Looks good to me. I've just made some small edits for v7 and wrote a commit
message to explain how we got here. This can be backpatched all the way, as
it's simply a correction. I do want to test on v11 first just for
complet
13 matches
Mail list logo
