Dear hackers,
While investigating the cfbot failure [1], I found a strange behavior of pg_ctl
command. How do you think? Is this a bug to be fixed or in the specification?
# Problem
The "pg_ctl start" command returns 0 (succeeded) even if the cluster has
already been started. This occurs on
On 2023-09-06 20:32, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
Thanks for looking into this!
On 6 Sep 2023, at 13:16, Fujii Masao
wrote:
While testing v4 patch, I noticed it doesn't handle the COMMIT AND
CHAIN case correctly.
When COMMIT AND CHAIN is executed, I believe the transaction timeout
counter
Hi Yuya,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 1:09 PM Yuya Watari wrote:
>
> 3. Future works
>
> 3.1. Redundant memory allocation of Lists
>
> When we need child EquivalenceMembers in a loop over ec_members, v20
> adds them to the list. However, since we cannot modify the ec_members,
> v20 always copies it.
At Thu, 7 Sep 2023 15:02:49 +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote in
> On Thu, 07 Sep 2023 14:29:56 +0900 (JST)
> Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > > \q quit psql
> > > \watch [[i=]SEC] [c=N] [m=MIN]
> > !> execute query every SEC seconds, up to N times
> > !>
Hi there,
I tested pg_rewind behavior and found a suspicious one.
Consider a scenario like this,
Server A: primary
Server B :replica of A
Server C :replica of B
and somehow A down ,so B gets promoted.
Server A: down
Server B :new primary
Server C :replica of B
In this case, pg_rewind can be
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 02:12:58PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Yeah, I agree that could be hacked quickly but note I haven't reviewed
> in detail if there are other design issues in this patch. Note that we
> thought first to support the upgrade of the publisher node, otherwise,
> immediately
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 10:13 AM vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 12:09, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> >
> > Other than that the patch LGTM.
>
> pgindent reported that the new comments added need to be re-adjusted,
> here is an updated patch for the same.
>
Thanks, the patch looks good to me
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 1:08 PM tender wang wrote:
>
> This thread [1] also Improving the heapgetpage function, and looks like
this thread.
>
> [1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/a9f40066-3d25-a240-4229-ec2fbe94e7a5%40yeah.net
Please don't top-post.
For the archives: That CF entry has
On 2023-09-06 11:17, James Coleman wrote:
> I've never been able to reproduce it (haven't tested the new version,
> but v28 at least) on my M1 Mac; where I've reproduced it is on Debian
> (first buster and now bullseye).
>
> I'm attaching several stacktraces in the hope that they provide some
>
On Thu, 07 Sep 2023 14:29:56 +0900 (JST)
Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> This topic is extracted from [1].
>
> As mentioned there, in psql, running \? displays the following lines.
>
> > \gdesc describe result of query, without executing it
> > \gexec execute
101 - 110 of 110 matches
Mail list logo