Hi hackers,
Here is an attempt to revive this patch from 2021-2022, that has been ready now
for a while, thanks to pg_get_acl() function that was committed in
4564f1c and d898665.
I've renamed the $subject of the email thread, to match the commitfest entry:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/50/50
While reading the stream read interfaces, I found a typo.
/*
* How many neighboring-on-disk blocks can we can scatter-read into
* other buffers at the same time? In this case we don't wait if we
Seems the second *can* is not necessary.
--
Regards
Junwang Zhao
Noah Misch writes:
> Thanks for debugging that. RestorePendingSyncs() also changes what
> RelationInitPhysicalAddr() puts in the relcache entry, so it needs to stay
> with RestoreRelationMap(). I'm attaching the fix I have in mind.
Ah. No objections here.
regards, tom
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 05:35:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> So the fix seems clear to me: RestoreRelationMap needs to happen
> before anything that could result in catalog lookups. I'm kind
> of inclined to move up the adjacent restores of non-transactional
> low-level stuff too, particularly Rest
Hey!
Motivated by recent user complaints regarding our documentation of behavior
in this area I propose the following to shore things up a bit.
There may be other places that need this coverage but it seems the most
likely place our users are going to experience this behavior is in using
set_conf
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 11:26:41AM GMT, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 12:01:29PM GMT, Joe Conway wrote:
> > I'm not sure why ICU is "Compile Time" rather than "Run Time" when it is not
> > statically linked.
>
> It reports U_UNICODE_VERSION at compile time. It's not necessarily
so 19. 10. 2024 v 13:02 odesílatel Laurenz Albe
napsal:
> On Sat, 2024-10-19 at 06:17 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Maybe we should document so the trigger is executed with the identity
> used by DML command always,
> > when the trigger function has no SECURITY DEFINER flag?
>
> Good idea. Ver
Hi Andrey,
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 5:39 PM Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
>
> Hi hackers!
>
> On a recent hacking workshop [0] Thomas mentioned that patches using new API
> would be welcomed.
> So I prototyped streamlining of B-tree vacuum for a discussion.
> When cleaning an index we must visit every
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024, at 12:13, jian he wrote:
> We already make RAW and can only have one column.
> if RAW has no default delimiter, then COPY FROM a text file will
> become one datum value;
> which makes it looks like importing a Large Object.
> (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/lo-funcs.html)
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 5:24 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 9:48 AM Dilip Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:38 PM Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 2:25 PM shveta malik
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 4:03 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >>
On Sat, 2024-10-19 at 06:17 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Maybe we should document so the trigger is executed with the identity used by
> DML command always,
> when the trigger function has no SECURITY DEFINER flag?
Good idea. Version 3 has documentation.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From f6f02eec3dcb29
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 1:24 AM Joel Jacobson wrote:
>>
> Handling of e.g. JSON and other structured text files that could contain
> newlines, in a seamless way seems important, so therefore the default is
> no delimiter for the raw format, so that the entire input is read as one data
> value for
Hi hackers!
On a recent hacking workshop [0] Thomas mentioned that patches using new API
would be welcomed.
So I prototyped streamlining of B-tree vacuum for a discussion.
When cleaning an index we must visit every index tuple, thus we uphold a
special invariant:
After checking a trailing block,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024, at 19:24, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> Attachments:
> * v11-0001-Refactor-ProcessCopyOptions-introduce-CopyFormat-enu.patch
> * v11-0002-Add-raw-format-to-COPY-command.patch
Here is a demo of a importing a decently sized real text file,
that can't currently be imported without the
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024, at 03:32, Michael Paquier wrote:
> If this area of the code is refactored so as a different error is
> triggered for these two specific queries, we'd still be alerted that
> something is wrong the same way for HEAD or what you are suggesting.
> I can see your argument, but it
15 matches
Mail list logo
