Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`

2023-09-08 Thread Álvaro Hernández
On 7/9/23 21:51, Gabriele Bartolini wrote: Hi everyone, I would like to propose a patch that allows administrators to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` via either a runt-time option to pass to the Postgres server process at startup (e.g. `--disable-alter-system=true`, false by default) or a new GUC

Re: CDC feature request

2021-03-18 Thread Álvaro Hernández
On 18/3/21 14:03, Stepan Yankevych wrote: > > Hi All! > >   > > Hopefully I’m using correct mail list   > > If not please show me right direction  > >   > > I’m quite struggling without native Change Data Capture feature in > PostgreSQL. > >   > > That would be great to implement it, possibly

Re: PROXY protocol support

2021-03-05 Thread Álvaro Hernández
On 5/3/21 10:03, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 1:33 AM Álvaro Hernández wrote: >> >> >> On 5/3/21 0:21, Jacob Champion wrote: >>> On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 21:45 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:07 PM Jacob

Re: PROXY protocol support

2021-03-04 Thread Álvaro Hernández
On 5/3/21 0:21, Jacob Champion wrote: > On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 21:45 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:07 PM Jacob Champion wrote: >>> Idle thought I had while setting up a local test rig: Are there any >>> compelling cases for allowing PROXY packets to arrive over Unix

Re: Extensibility of the PostgreSQL wire protocol

2021-02-19 Thread Álvaro Hernández
On 19/2/21 19:30, Jan Wieck wrote: > [...] > > I also am not sure if building a connection pool into a background > worker or postmaster is a good idea to begin with. One of the > important features of a pool is to be able to suspend traffic and make > the server completely idle to for example

Re: Extensibility of the PostgreSQL wire protocol

2021-02-19 Thread Álvaro Hernández
On 19/2/21 14:48, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > [...] > > I can see value in supporting different protocols. I don't like the > approach discussed in this thread, however. > > For example, there has been discussion elsewhere about integrating > connection pooling into the server itself. For that,

Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration

2021-02-12 Thread Álvaro Hernández
On 12/2/21 19:44, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:26 AM Álvaro Hernández wrote: >> As I stated in the mentioned post, I believe Babelfish is a very >> welcomed addition to the PostgreSQL ecosystem. It allows PostgreSQL to >> reach other users, o

PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration

2021-02-12 Thread Álvaro Hernández
    I would like to share my thoughts in the list about the potential PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration. There is already a thread about protocol hooks [1], but I'd like to offer my PoV from a higher level perspective and keep that thread for the technical aspects of the protocol hooks. This