Thanks Álvaro
Will work on it and send the updated patch.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 4:17 PM Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hello,
>
> One thing I realized a few days ago is that since commit bd09f024a1bb we
> have type regdatabase, so instead of having two functions (one taking
> name and one taking Oid)
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 3:48 PM Japin Li wrote:
>
> Hi Akshay,
>
> Thanks for updating the patch.
>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 at 13:33, Akshay Joshi
> wrote:
> > Hi Chao
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing my patch.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 5:5
Hi Chao
Thanks for reviewing my patch.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 5:59 AM Chao Li wrote:
> Hi Akshay,
>
> I just reviewed v3 and got some comments:
>
> > On Nov 17, 2025, at 22:34, Akshay Joshi
> wrote:
> >
> > All the review comments have been addressed i
The v3 patch adds a check for the CONNECT privilege on the target database
for pg_get_database_ddl(). This aligns its security model with functions
like pg_database_size(). Note that revoking permissions on the *pg_database*
table alone is insufficient to restrict DDL access; users must manually
re
On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 11:19 AM Japin Li wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 02:02:30PM +0530, Akshay Joshi wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 10:18 AM Quan Zongliang
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/13/25 12:17 PM, Quan Zongliang wrote:
>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 10:18 AM Quan Zongliang
wrote:
>
>
> On 11/13/25 12:17 PM, Quan Zongliang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/12/25 8:04 PM, Akshay Joshi wrote:
> >> Hi Hackers,
> >>
> >> I’m submitting a patch as part of the broader Retail
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 9:47 AM Quan Zongliang
wrote:
>
>
> On 11/12/25 8:04 PM, Akshay Joshi wrote:
> > Hi Hackers,
> >
> > I’m submitting a patch as part of the broader Retail DDL Functions
> > project described by Andrew Dunstan https://www.postgresql.org/m
ocumentation, in-code comments, and regression tests,
all of which pass successfully.
*Note:* To run the regression tests, particularly the pg_upgrade tests
successfully, I had to add a helper function, ddl_filter (in database.sql),
which removes locale and collation-related information from the
pg_
majority feels it should be
included in this feature.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 8:18 PM Marcos Pegoraro wrote:
> Em sex., 7 de nov. de 2025 às 11:27, Akshay Joshi <
> [email protected]> escreveu:
>
>> I don’t think we need that statement. Could you please elaborate on wher
On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 6:45 PM Marcos Pegoraro wrote:
> Em sex., 7 de nov. de 2025 às 09:21, Akshay Joshi <
> [email protected]> escreveu:
>
>> Attached is the v7 patch, which is ready for review.
>>
>>> <https://enterprisedb.com>
>>&g
Hi Hackers,
Make the pretty flag a default parameter by adding CREATE OR REPLACE
FUNCTION in system_functions.sql.
Attached is the v7 patch, which is ready for review.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 5:17 PM Akshay Joshi
wrote:
> Hi Hackers,
>
> Added a new #define GET_DDL_PRETTY_FLAGS be
behavior
for pg_get__ddl functions.
Updated the logic of the get_formatted_string function based on Tim
Waizenegger’s suggestion.
I am attaching the new v6 patch, which is ready for review.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 3:08 PM Akshay Joshi
wrote:
> Thanks, Mark, for your review comments and the upda
Thanks, Mark, for your review comments and the updated patch.
I’ve incorporated your changes and prepared a combined v5 patch. The v5
patch is attached for further review.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 10:15 PM Mark Wong wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 01:47:53PM +053
On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 12:19 AM Philip Alger wrote:
>
>
>
>>> The get_formatted_string function is needed. Instead of using multiple
>> if statements for the pretty flag, it’s better to have a generic
>> function. This will be useful if the pretty-format DDL implementation is
>> accepted by the
On Wed, 22 Oct, 2025, 17:30 Tim Waizenegger, <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 12:27 PM Chao Li wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > Thanks for working on this. I haven’t finished reviewing the entire
> patch. But I got a quick question:
> >
> > While reviewing a simi
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 12:51 PM jian he
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 8:51 PM Akshay Joshi
> wrote:
> >
> > Please find attached the v3 patch, which resolves all compilation errors
> and warnings.
> >
>
> drop table if exists t, ts, ts1;
> create table t
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 2:39 PM Chao Li wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 16, 2025, at 20:50, Akshay Joshi
> wrote:
> >
> > Please find attached the v3 patch, which resolves all compilation errors
> and warnings.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 6:06 PM Philip Alger
AS PERMISSIVE
FOR ALL
TO regress_rls_alice, regress_rls_dave
USING (true)
;
The patch includes documentation, in-code comments, and regression tests,
all of which pass successfully.
-
Regards,
Akshay Joshi
EDB (EnterpriseDB)
0001-Add-pg_get_policy_
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 11:00 PM Philip Alger wrote:
> Hi Akshay,
>
> When applying the patch, I got a number of errors and the tests failed. I
> think it stems from:
>
> + targetTable = relation_open(tableID, NoLock);
> + relation_close(targetTable, NoLock);
>
>
> I changed them to use "AccessSh
Please find attached the v3 patch, which resolves all compilation errors
and warnings.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 6:06 PM Philip Alger wrote:
> Hi Akshay,
>
>
As for the statement terminator, it’s useful to include it, while
>>> running multiple queries together could result in a syntax error.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:55 PM Álvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have reviewed this patch before and provided a number of comments that
> have been addressed by Akshay (so I encourage you to list my name and
> this address in a Reviewed-by trailer line in the commit message). One
> thing I
21 matches
Mail list logo