Re: Tracking of page changes for backup purposes. PTRACK [POC]

Hi! > 21 дек. 2017 г., в 5:51, Michael Paquier > написал(а): > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Tomas Vondra >> wrote: Isn't more effective hold this

Re: GSoC 2018

earned index prototype Expected outcome: Design for integration of learned indexes into PostgreSQL (possibly, using index-as-extension technology), prototype implementation and benchmarks. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Re: New gist vacuum.

Hi hackers! Here is the patch that deletes pages during GiST VACUUM. > 12 нояб. 2017 г., в 23:20, Andrey Borodin <x4...@yandex-team.ru> написал(а): > > If author and community do not object, I want to continue work on > Konstantin's patch. ==Purpose== Long story sh

Re: Tracking of page changes for backup purposes. PTRACK [POC]

I have two concerns about this: 1. Does this affect the performance of the database when PTRACK is not enabled? 2. What is the cost of having PTRACK enabled? Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Re: GSoC 2018

ary at least to validate the idea. I'd sign up as co-mentor for this. Moreover this will attract students from huge pool of ML hackers. Also, I'm planning to add my previous-year project about sorting. Or add something WAL-G-related under Postgres umbrella (probably, WAL-scanning for delta-backup

Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

> 30 нояб. 2017 г., в 23:07, Andrey Borodin <x4...@yandex-team.ru> написал(а): > > Seems like it was not a big deal of patching, I've fixed those bits (see > attachment). > I've done only simple tests as for now, but I'm planning to do better testing > before next CF.

Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

the heapallindexed check doesn't actually > care about index structure at all. Seems like it was not a big deal of patching, I've fixed those bits (see attachment). I've done only simple tests as for now, but I'm planning to do better testing before next CF. Thanks for mentioning

Re: Commit fest 2017-11

t; . Seems like we have common view with Peter Geoghegan and Anastasia that found drawback will be fixed before next CF. If there is no objections, I'll put "needs review" to move. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Re: [HACKERS] CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY

ll commit > it before next commitfest. Hi! I've took a glance at the patch, here's what catches my eye in comments: corrdinate, dimenstions, descinding, stoty. I'll try to provide meaningful review next week. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

<    2   3   4   5   6   7