t;
> > For the record, I'm tentatively in favor of including something like
> > this in contrib.
>
> I'm much less fussed by this in contrib/ (with the same concern you
> noted), at minimum as an example of how to do logging in other formats.
>
> --
> -- Ch
hat these things are
> always UTF8?
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
--
[image: XOE Solutions] <http://xoe.solutions/> DAVID ARNOLD
Gerente General
xoe.solutions
dar
the problem definition is "unnecessary", which implies
judgment on responsibilities and ecosystems working together, rather than a
broken system.
El mar., 17 abr. 2018 a las 7:31, David Arnold ()
escribió:
> >To me it's implied by the doc at:
>
> https://www.postgresql.o
lid, seems sometimes is tought it's limits in very
mondane practicability and efficiency needs.
El mar., 17 abr. 2018, 6:55 a.m., Daniel Verite
escribió:
> David Arnold wrote:
>
> > Interesting, does that implicitly mean the whole log event would get
> > transmitted
ould
be equally happy with that solution.
The second order problem, after all is just that: of second order...
El lun., 16 abr. 2018, 1:28 p.m., Daniel Verite
escribió:
> David Arnold wrote:
>
> > Not claiming this assumption does imply parsing of a *rolling* set
> >
6 abr. 2018 a las 9:41, David Fetter ()
escribió:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:06:29AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > On 04/15/2018 05:05 PM, Christophe Pettus wrote:
> > >> On Apr 15, 2018, at 12:16, David Arnold wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Core-Problem: &quo
issues/564
Let's see what Eduardo has to inform us about this...
El dom., 15 abr. 2018 a las 16:05, Christophe Pettus ()
escribió:
>
> > On Apr 15, 2018, at 12:16, David Arnold wrote:
> >
> > Core-Problem: "Multi line logs are unnecessarily inconvenient to parse
.io/documentation/current/getting_started/parser.html
El dom., 15 abr. 2018 a las 13:29, John W Higgins ()
escribió:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 11:08 AM, David Arnold wrote:
>
>> >This would appear to solve multiline issues within Fluent.
>> >https://docs.fluentd.org/v
tbit.io/documentation/0.13/input/tail.html#multiline> support
configuration feature."
https://fluentbit.io/documentation/0.13/parser/regular_expression.html
El dom., 15 abr. 2018 a las 13:08, David Arnold ()
escribió:
> >This would appear to solve multiline issues within Fluent..
nes
of unknown cardinality.
El dom., 15 abr. 2018 a las 13:00, David Arnold ()
escribió:
> >It looks like the thread skipped over the problem space for the solution
> space pretty fast
>
> OK, I apologize, it seemed to me from the feedback that the problem was
> already uncontested
12:46, Christophe Pettus ()
escribió:
>
> > On Apr 15, 2018, at 10:39, David Arnold wrote:
> >
> > In the light of the specific use case / problem for this thread to be
> born, what exactly would you suggest?
>
> It looks like the thread skipped over the problem space for
fore a SPOF)
First point is definitely a strong one. Did I miss any additional arguments?
El dom., 15 abr. 2018 a las 12:24, Christophe Pettus ()
escribió:
>
> > On Apr 15, 2018, at 10:07, Christophe Pettus wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Apr 15, 2018, at 09:51, David Arnold
te intention to take a step forward.
Best Regards, David Arnold
El dom., 15 abr. 2018, 10:49 a.m., David Arnold
escribió:
> > Exactly - arrays, maps, nested json objects. It's more organized and
> easier to reason about. As postgresql becomes more and more sophisticated
> over t
> Exactly - arrays, maps, nested json objects. It's more organized and
easier to reason about. As postgresql becomes more and more sophisticated
over time, I see flat logging becoming more unwieldy. With tools like jq,
reading and querying json on the command line is simple and user friendly,
and u
>A slightly larger lift would include escaping newlines and ensuring that JSON
output is always single lines, however long.
I think that's necessary, actually I was implicitly assuming that as a
prerequisite. I cannot imagine anything else beeing actually useful.
Alternatively, I'm sure logfmt ha
;a newline?"
>
> - ...
>
> > JSON, whatever gripes I have about
> > the format[1] is extremely well specified, and hence has excellent
> > parsing libraries.
>
> It has, if nothing else, the benefit of coming around later and seeing
> what happened with CSV.
>
. But I'm in favor to step back with that idea in favour of
prioritizing JSON.
El sáb., 14 abr. 2018, 11:03 a.m., David Arnold
escribió:
> >I'm dubious that JSON is "easier on machines" than CSV.
>
> Under common paradigms you are right, but if we talk of line-by-lin
>I'm dubious that JSON is "easier on machines" than CSV.
Under common paradigms you are right, but if we talk of line-by-line
streaming with subsequent processing, then it's a show stopper. Of course,
some log aggregators have buffers for that and can do Multiline parsing on
that buffer, but
1. No
> Plus it's likely only a short-lived interchange format, not something to be
retained for a long period.
Absolutely.
There might be an argument that it's not easy on the eyes in the case it
would be consumed by a pair of them. It's absolutely valid. Golang
community has found a solution for that
xoe.solutions/> DAVID ARNOLD
Gerente General
xoe.solutions
dar@xoe.solutions
+57 (315) 304 13 68
*Confidentiality Note: * This email may contain confidential and/or private
information. If you received this email in error please delete and notify
sender.
*Environmental Consideration: * Please avoid pri
20 matches
Mail list logo