On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 4:16 PM Nathan Bossart
wrote:
> It seems unlikely that this will be committed for v15. Swaha, should the
> commitfest entry be adjusted to v16 and moved to the next commitfest?
>
>
Yes please, thank you Nathan
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 4:58 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 07:42:21PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 03:23:07PM -0800, Swaha Miller wrote:
> > > A prominent use case for grouping functions into modules would
> > > be
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 1:06 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 08:53:15AM -0800, Swaha Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 3:51 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Hm. If the functional requirement is "group objects without needing
> &g
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 3:51 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm. If the functional requirement is "group objects without needing
> any out-in-the-filesystem infrastructure", then I could see defining
> a module as being exactly like an extension except there's no such
> infrastructure --- and hence no
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 10:46 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 06:28:30PM -0800, Swaha Miller wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm following up from Jim's POC for adding MODULE to PostgreSQL. [1]
> >
> > My proposal implements modules as schema objects
ema and they cannot be
> in a module.
>
> Of course, that idea of modules would also ease porting large DB-based
> applications from other database systems.
>
Indeed. Looking at commercial databases Oracle and Microsoft SQLServer,
they both have implemented module-like structures.
Swaha Miller
2022 v 5:46 odesílatel Julien Rouhaud
> napsal:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 05:25:27AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> >
>> > čt 3. 2. 2022 v 3:28 odesílatel Swaha Miller
>> > napsal:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
