On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 4:53 PM John Naylor wrote:
> Thanks for the report! I don't see any immediate evidence of deleterious
> effects, but it's still sloppy. To reduce risk going forward, I think we
> should always access this pointer via the struct rather than a separate copy,
> quick attemp
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 1:58 AM Vallimaharajan G <
vallimaharajan...@zohocorp.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Developers,
> We have discovered a bug in the parallel_vacuum_reset_dead_items
function in PG v17.2. Specifically:
>
> TidStoreDestroy(dead_items) frees the dead_items pointer.
> The pointer is rei
