Andres Freund wrote:
> Medium term, it
> seems to me, we should start actually move a lot of the adt code into a
> library that can be included (or possibly just compiled?) both by
> frontend and backend code. Which kinda seems to imply we'd need
> compatible elog support for frontend code,
> Michael, is there any problem including datatype/* headers in ecpg
> that
> are frontend clean? I see no such usage so far, that's why I'm
> asking.
When the pgtypes library was created we tried to include only the bits
and pieces needed to not create unnecessary hassles, but if it compiles
Hi,
On 2017-10-04 11:36:56 +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > On 10/03/2017 04:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > I like the new-header-file idea because it will result in minimal code
> > > churn and thus minimal back-patching hazards.
I'm not sure it's that little code churn,
