Hi Sawada-san,
Thank you very much for your detailed review and suggestions for the v2
patch.
Also, thank you for pointing out the top-posting issue. I'll follow the
mailing list style from now on.
---
>+ /* Report memory usage for dead_items tracking */
>+ vac_work_mem = AmAu
(please avoid top-posting[1] on this mailing list)
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 7:15 AM 河田達也 wrote:
>
> Hi Sawada-san,
>
> Thank you very much for your review and helpful comments on my previous patch.
> I have revised the patch following your suggestions:
>
> ・Report total memory usage rather than pe
Hi Sawada-san,
Thank you very much for your review and helpful comments on my previous
patch.
I have revised the patch following your suggestions:
・Report total memory usage rather than peak memory, which is more
meaningful for users.
・Removed the reset counter, since index scan counts already re
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 8:01 AM 河田達也 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a patch that adds memory usage reporting to
> VACUUM VERBOSE output. This helps users understand how much memory
> is being used for dead tuple tracking and whether memory limits are
> being hit during vacuum oper
Hi,
I would like to propose a patch that adds memory usage reporting to
VACUUM VERBOSE output. This helps users understand how much memory
is being used for dead tuple tracking and whether memory limits are
being hit during vacuum operations.
I have tested this patch with both serial and paralle