On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 14:08 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Pushed with a few small tweaks to make it match project style, thanks!
Thank you!
--Jacob
Pushed with a few small tweaks to make it match project style, thanks!
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
> On 25 Mar 2022, at 23:45, Jacob Champion wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 18:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Jacob Champion writes:
>>> Do I need to merge my tiny test program into the libpq_pipeline tests?
>>
>> Doesn't seem worth the trouble to me, notably because you'd
>> then have to cope
On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 18:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jacob Champion writes:
> > Do I need to merge my tiny test program into the libpq_pipeline tests?
>
> Doesn't seem worth the trouble to me, notably because you'd
> then have to cope with non-SSL builds too.
Fine by me.
v5 moves the docs out
Jacob Champion writes:
> Do I need to merge my tiny test program into the libpq_pipeline tests?
Doesn't seem worth the trouble to me, notably because you'd
then have to cope with non-SSL builds too.
regards, tom lane
> On 25 Mar 2022, at 22:25, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 15:32 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> This seems totally reasonable. However, I think it should update the
>> documentation somehow.
>
> Done in v4.
I would prefer to not introduce a for this, I think adding it as a
under
On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 15:32 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 3:21 PM Jacob Champion wrote:
> > v3 rebases over Andres' changes and actually adds the Perl driver that
> > I missed the git-add for.
>
> This seems totally reasonable. However, I think it should update the
>
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 3:21 PM Jacob Champion wrote:
> v3 rebases over Andres' changes and actually adds the Perl driver that
> I missed the git-add for.
This seems totally reasonable. However, I think it should update the
documentation somehow.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 23:20 +, Jacob Champion wrote:
> First stab in v2-0002. Though I see that Andres is overhauling the
> tests in this folder today [1], so I'll need to watch that thread. :)
v3 rebases over Andres' changes and actually adds the Perl driver that
I missed the git-add for.
On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 14:11 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2/23/22 13:38, Jacob Champion wrote:
> >
> > If this looks good, I'm not sure how best to test it in the regression
> > suite. I see that libpq has an installcheck recipe that compiles a test
> > executable for URI parsing; should I
On 2/23/22 13:38, Jacob Champion wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As part of the NSS work it came up [1] that clients don't have a good
> way to ask libpq what SSL library it was compiled with, unless they
> already have a connection pointer so that they can call
> PQsslAttribute(conn, "library"). This poses
Hello,
As part of the NSS work it came up [1] that clients don't have a good
way to ask libpq what SSL library it was compiled with, unless they
already have a connection pointer so that they can call
PQsslAttribute(conn, "library"). This poses a chicken-and-egg problem:
with the NSS proposal,
12 matches
Mail list logo
