Marcus Gartner writes:
> subpath(ltree,offset,len) now correctly errors when given an offset less
> than -n where n is the number of labels in the given ltree. A duplicate
> block of code has been removed which allowed an offset as low as -2n.
Nice catch ... as far as I can see from the git histo
subpath(ltree,offset,len) now correctly errors when given an offset less
than -n where n is the number of labels in the given ltree. A duplicate
block of code has been removed which allowed an offset as low as -2n.
0001-Fix-LTREE-subpath-with-negative-offset.patch
Description: Binary data
