On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 4:28 AM Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 22:06 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > Will do first thing tomorrow.
>
> Just wanted to confirm that I pushed Fedora RPMs built against LLVM 15
> by adding these patches.
>
> Thanks Thomas.
Cool.
FTR I still have to finis
Hi,
On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 22:06 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Will do first thing tomorrow.
Just wanted to confirm that I pushed Fedora RPMs built against LLVM 15
by adding these patches.
Thanks Thomas.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:01 PM Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-10-11 at 11:07 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > OK, I'll wait for the dust to settle on our 15 release and then
> > back-patch this. Then I'll keep working on the opaque pointer
> > support for master, which LLVM 16 will need (I e
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 2022-10-11 at 11:07 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> OK, I'll wait for the dust to settle on our 15 release and then
> back-patch this. Then I'll keep working on the opaque pointer
> support for master, which LLVM 16 will need (I expect we'll
> eventually want to back-patch that ev
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:45 AM Zhihong Yu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 2:41 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2022-10-03 12:16:12 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > I haven't yet run through the whole regression test with an assert enabled
>> > llvm because an assert-enabled llvm is *SLOW*, but it
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 2:41 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-10-03 12:16:12 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I haven't yet run through the whole regression test with an assert
> enabled
> > llvm because an assert-enabled llvm is *SLOW*, but it got through the
> first
> > few parallel grou
Hi,
On 2022-10-03 12:16:12 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I haven't yet run through the whole regression test with an assert enabled
> llvm because an assert-enabled llvm is *SLOW*, but it got through the first
> few parallel groups ok. Using an optimized llvm 15, all tests pass with
> PGOPTIONS=-
Hi,
On 2022-10-03 18:34:18 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> One option I thought about as a stopgap measure is to use
> LLVMContextSetOpaquePointers(context, false) to turn the new code
> paths off, but it doesn't seem to work for me and I couldn't figure
> out why yet (it still aborts -- probably the
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 4:56 PM Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
> While building PostgreSQL 15 RC 1 with LLVM 15, I got a build failure as
> follows:
>
> cc -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> -Werror=vla -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wendif-labels
> -Wmissing-
-15-or-above.patch
Thanks.
Regards,
sunpoet
From bd2f6d2ec5369b5e33c6bf41560cdae3f8088f07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Po-Chuan Hsieh
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2022 22:23:41 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix build with LLVM 15 or above
- Upstream has fixed the struct name prefix from LLVMJIT to LLVMOrc [1].
- Upstre
10 matches
Mail list logo