Em sex., 14 de fev. de 2020 às 03:13, Michael Paquier
escreveu:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 02:22:36PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > I just kept it, even if I duplicated the error message, the style was
> kept
> > and in my opinion it is much more coherent and readable.
> > But your solution is a
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 02:22:36PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> I just kept it, even if I duplicated the error message, the style was kept
> and in my opinion it is much more coherent and readable.
> But your solution is also good, and yes, it is worth it, because even with
> small benefits, the c
Em qua., 12 de fev. de 2020 às 22:25, Tom Lane escreveu:
> Ranier Vilela writes:
> > Coverity detected a dead code in the src / interfaces / libpq / fe-auth.c
> > file, to correct it, a simplification was made and the oom_error goto was
> > removed, since it is clearly redundant and its presence
Ranier Vilela writes:
> Coverity detected a dead code in the src / interfaces / libpq / fe-auth.c
> file, to correct it, a simplification was made and the oom_error goto was
> removed, since it is clearly redundant and its presence can be confusing.
I'm kind of disinclined to let Coverity dictate
Hi,
Coverity detected a dead code in the src / interfaces / libpq / fe-auth.c
file, to correct it, a simplification was made and the oom_error goto was
removed, since it is clearly redundant and its presence can be confusing.
The second part of the patch refers to the file src / interfaces / libpq
