Re: [PATCH v16] GSSAPI encryption support

2018-06-11 Thread Nico Williams
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:31:12PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > On 06/11/2018 01:13 PM, Nico Williams wrote: > >Well, all the free CIs like Travis and Appveyor do it this way. You > >don't have to *use* it just because the .yml files are in the source > >tree. But you have to have the .yml file

Re: [PATCH v16] GSSAPI encryption support

2018-06-11 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 06/11/2018 01:13 PM, Nico Williams wrote: Well, all the free CIs like Travis and Appveyor do it this way. You don't have to *use* it just because the .yml files are in the source tree. But you have to have the .yml files in the source tree in order to use these CIs. It'd be nice to be a

Re: [PATCH v16] GSSAPI encryption support

2018-06-11 Thread Nico Williams
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 09:27:17AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Thomas Munro > wrote: > >> Cool! Is there any reason that your patch for Travis and AppVeyor > >> integration is not just committed to master? > > > > I think that's a good idea and I know that some oth

Re: [PATCH v16] GSSAPI encryption support

2018-06-11 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: >> Cool! Is there any reason that your patch for Travis and AppVeyor >> integration is not just committed to master? > > I think that's a good idea and I know that some others are in favour. One problem is that was discussed at PGCon it commits

Re: [PATCH v16] GSSAPI encryption support

2018-06-07 Thread Nico Williams
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 10:11:52AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Nico Williams wrote: > > Cool! Is there any reason that your patch for Travis and AppVeyor > > integration is not just committed to master? > > I think that's a good idea and I know that some others a

Re: [PATCH v16] GSSAPI encryption support

2018-06-07 Thread Thomas Munro
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Nico Williams wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 12:16:31PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: >> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Robbie Harwood wrote: >> > Me and the bot are having an argument. This should green Linux but I >> > dunno about Windows. >> >> BTW if you're l

Re: [PATCH v16] GSSAPI encryption support

2018-06-07 Thread Nico Williams
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 12:16:31PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Robbie Harwood wrote: > > Me and the bot are having an argument. This should green Linux but I > > dunno about Windows. > > BTW if you're looking for a way to try stuff out on Windows exactly > the w

Re: [PATCH v16] GSSAPI encryption support

2018-06-04 Thread Thomas Munro
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Me and the bot are having an argument. This should green Linux but I > dunno about Windows. BTW if you're looking for a way to try stuff out on Windows exactly the way cfbot does it without posting a new patch to the mailing list, I put so

Re: [PATCH v16] GSSAPI encryption support

2018-05-25 Thread Robbie Harwood
Robbie Harwood writes: > Thomas Munro writes: > >> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Robbie Harwood wrote: >> >>> Zombie patch is back from the dead. >> >> Hi Robbie, >> >> Robots[1] vs zombies: >> >> + $postgres->RemoveFile('src/backennd/libpq/be-gssapi-common.c'); >> >> Typo, breaks on Windows