On Apr 10, 2024, at 10:29, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> So the whole thing is
>
>
>
> The syntax of and is then punted to
> ECMAScript 5.1.
>
> 0x2 is a HexIntegerLiteral. (There can be no dots in that.)
>
> p10 is an Identifier.
>
> So I think this is all correct.
That makes sense,
On 07.04.24 18:13, David E. Wheeler wrote:
Hello Hackers,
A question about the behavior of the JSON Path parser. The docs[1] have this to
say about numbers:
Numeric literals in SQL/JSON path expressions follow JavaScript rules, which
are different from both SQL and JSON in some minor
On Apr 7, 2024, at 15:46, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> I guess jsonpath assumes that hex, octal, and binary literals are
> integers. So there's no ambiguity about any fractional part that might
> follow.
Yeah, that’s what the comment in the flex file says:
On 2024-04-07 18:13 +0200, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> A question about the behavior of the JSON Path parser. The docs[1]
> have this to say about numbers:
>
> > Numeric literals in SQL/JSON path expressions follow JavaScript
> > rules, which are different from both SQL and JSON in some minor
> >
Hello Hackers,
A question about the behavior of the JSON Path parser. The docs[1] have this to
say about numbers:
> Numeric literals in SQL/JSON path expressions follow JavaScript rules, which
> are different from both SQL and JSON in some minor details. For example,
> SQL/JSON path allows
