On 2019-Jul-16, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> The green gamification dot on people’s Github profiles might light up if the
> machine readable format with email address was used (and the user has that
> specific email connected to their Github account unless it’s a primary email).
> Looking at commit
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 04:33:07PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2019-07-16 19:26:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've wondered for some time what you think the "-" means in this.
>
> Up to master. Occasionally there's bugs that only need to be fixed in
> some back branches etc.
Is "-" most
Hi,
On 2019-07-16 19:26:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > They don't preclude each other though. E.g. it'd be sensible to have both
>
> >> Per gripe from Ken Tanzer. Back-patch to 9.6. The issue exists
> >> further back, but before 9.6 the code looks very different and it
Andres Freund writes:
> They don't preclude each other though. E.g. it'd be sensible to have both
>> Per gripe from Ken Tanzer. Back-patch to 9.6. The issue exists
>> further back, but before 9.6 the code looks very different and it
>> doesn't actually know whether the "var" name matches
Hi,
On 2019-07-16 10:33:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
> > As mentioned on different threads, "Discussion" is the only one we had
> > a strong agreement with. Could it be possible to consider things like
> > Author, Reported-by, Reviewed-by or Backpatch-through for example
> On 16 Jul 2019, at 16:33, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Michael Paquier writes:
>> As mentioned on different threads, "Discussion" is the only one we had
>> a strong agreement with. Could it be possible to consider things like
>> Author, Reported-by, Reviewed-by or Backpatch-through for example and
>>
Michael Paquier writes:
> As mentioned on different threads, "Discussion" is the only one we had
> a strong agreement with. Could it be possible to consider things like
> Author, Reported-by, Reviewed-by or Backpatch-through for example and
> extend to that? The first three ones are useful for
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:49:26PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I would have tried to exclude the first line messages if I'd thought
> of that. But anyway, the reason for the low Doc number is case
> sensitivity. I ran that on a Mac and its lame collation support failed
> me in the "sort" step
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 5:12 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro writes:
> > 42 Doc
> [...] I see a lot more than 42 such commit messages in the past
> year, so not sure what you were counting?
I would have tried to exclude the first line messages if I'd thought
of that. But anyway, the
Thomas Munro writes:
> Here are the tags that people have used in the past year, in commit messages:
> 763 Author
>9 Authors
> 144 Backpatch-through
> 55 Backpatch
> 14 Bug
> 14 Co-authored-by
> 27 Diagnosed-By
> 1593 Discussion
> 42 Doc
> 284
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 1:25 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 09:44:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I thought we *did* have an agreement, to wit using
> >
> > Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/
> >
> > to link to relevant mail thread(s). Some people use more tags
> > but that
11 matches
Mail list logo
