On 2020-12-22 11:16, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Thanks for your comments.
On 2020-12-22 09:39, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On 2020-12-21 13:16:50 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2020-12-02 13:52:43 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Pushed. Thanks!
Why are wal_records/fpi long, instead of uint64?
Thanks for your comments.
On 2020-12-22 09:39, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On 2020-12-21 13:16:50 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2020-12-02 13:52:43 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Pushed. Thanks!
Why are wal_records/fpi long, instead of uint64?
longwal_records;/* # of WAL
Hi,
On 2020-12-21 13:16:50 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2020-12-02 13:52:43 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > Pushed. Thanks!
>
> Why are wal_records/fpi long, instead of uint64?
> longwal_records;/* # of WAL records produced */
> longwal_fpi;
Hi,
On 2020-12-02 13:52:43 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Pushed. Thanks!
Why are wal_records/fpi long, instead of uint64?
longwal_records;/* # of WAL records produced */
longwal_fpi;/* # of WAL full page images
produced */
uint64
On 2020/12/01 14:01, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/26 16:07, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-11-25 20:19, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/19 16:31, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-11-17 11:46, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/16 16:35, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-11-12 14:58, Fujii Masao
On 2020/11/26 16:07, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-11-25 20:19, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/19 16:31, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-11-17 11:46, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/16 16:35, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-11-12 14:58, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/06 10:25, Masahiro Ikeda
On 2020-11-25 20:19, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/19 16:31, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-11-17 11:46, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/16 16:35, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-11-12 14:58, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/06 10:25, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-10-30 11:50, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/19 16:31, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-11-17 11:46, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/16 16:35, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-11-12 14:58, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/06 10:25, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-10-30 11:50, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/10/29 17:03, Masahiro Ikeda
On 2020-11-17 12:53, lchch1...@sina.cn wrote:
Thanks for your comments.
You're understanding is almost the same as mine.
It describes when not only backends but also other backgrounds
initialize a new wal page,
wal buffer's space is already used and there is no space.
'Total number of times
On 2020-11-17 11:46, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/16 16:35, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-11-12 14:58, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/06 10:25, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-10-30 11:50, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/10/29 17:03, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your comments and advice.
>> Thanks for your comments.
>>
>> You're understanding is almost the same as mine.
>> It describes when not only backends but also other backgrounds initialize a
>> new wal page,
>> wal buffer's space is already used and there is no space.
>>
>>> 'Total number of times WAL data written to the
On 2020/11/16 18:24, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-11-13 12:32, lchch1...@sina.cn wrote:
Now, pg_stat_wal supports reset all informantion in WalStats
using pg_stat_reset_shared('wal') function.
Isn't it enough?
Yes it ok, sorry I miss this infomation.
OK.
3. I do not think it's a
On 2020/11/16 16:35, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-11-12 14:58, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/06 10:25, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-10-30 11:50, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/10/29 17:03, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your comments and advice. I updated the patch.
On 2020-10-21
On 2020-11-13 12:32, lchch1...@sina.cn wrote:
Now, pg_stat_wal supports reset all informantion in WalStats
using pg_stat_reset_shared('wal') function.
Isn't it enough?
Yes it ok, sorry I miss this infomation.
OK.
3. I do not think it's a correct describe in document for
'wal_buffers_full'.
On 2020-11-12 14:58, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/06 10:25, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-10-30 11:50, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/10/29 17:03, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your comments and advice. I updated the patch.
On 2020-10-21 18:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Tue, 20 Oct
On 2020-11-12 16:27, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/12 14:58, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/06 10:25, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-10-30 11:50, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/10/29 17:03, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your comments and advice. I updated the patch.
On 2020-10-21 18:03,
>Now, pg_stat_wal supports reset all informantion in WalStats
>using pg_stat_reset_shared('wal') function.
>Isn't it enough?
Yes it ok, sorry I miss this infomation.
>> 3. I do not think it's a correct describe in document for
>> 'wal_buffers_full'.
>Where should I rewrite the description? If
On 2020/11/12 14:58, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/06 10:25, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-10-30 11:50, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/10/29 17:03, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your comments and advice. I updated the patch.
On 2020-10-21 18:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Tue, 20
On 2020/11/06 10:25, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2020-10-30 11:50, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/10/29 17:03, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your comments and advice. I updated the patch.
On 2020-10-21 18:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:11:29 +0900, Masahiro Ikeda
On 2020-10-30 11:50, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/10/29 17:03, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your comments and advice. I updated the patch.
On 2020-10-21 18:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:11:29 +0900, Masahiro Ikeda
wrote in
On 2020-10-20 12:46, Amit Kapila wrote:
On 2020/10/20 11:31, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Hi,
I think we need to add some statistics to pg_stat_wal view.
Although there are some parameter related WAL,
there are few statistics for tuning them.
I think it's better to provide the following statistics.
Please let me know your comments.
On 2020/10/29 17:03, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your comments and advice. I updated the patch.
On 2020-10-21 18:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:11:29 +0900, Masahiro Ikeda
wrote in
On 2020-10-20 12:46, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I see that we also need to add
Hi,
Thanks for your comments and advice. I updated the patch.
On 2020-10-21 18:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:11:29 +0900, Masahiro Ikeda
wrote in
On 2020-10-20 12:46, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I see that we also need to add extra code to capture these stats (some
> of which
At Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:44:53 +0900, Masahiro Ikeda
wrote in
> On 2020-10-21 18:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:11:29 +0900, Masahiro Ikeda
> > wrote in
> >> On 2020-10-20 12:46, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >> > I see that we also need to add extra code to capture these stats
On 2020-10-21 18:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:11:29 +0900, Masahiro Ikeda
wrote in
On 2020-10-20 12:46, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I see that we also need to add extra code to capture these stats (some
> of which is in performance-critical path especially in
>
On 2020-10-21 15:54, lchch1...@sina.cn wrote:
I think it's really a more convenient way to collect wal usage
information,
with it we can query when I want. Several points on my side:
Thanks for your comments.
1. It will be nice If you provide a chance to reset the information in
WalStats,
On 2020-10-21 13:41, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:41 PM Masahiro Ikeda
wrote:
On 2020-10-20 12:46, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:01 AM Masahiro Ikeda
>> 1. Basic statistics of WAL activity
>>
>> - wal_records: Total number of WAL records generated
>> -
At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:11:29 +0900, Masahiro Ikeda
wrote in
> On 2020-10-20 12:46, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I see that we also need to add extra code to capture these stats (some
> > of which is in performance-critical path especially in
> > XLogInsertRecord) which again makes me a bit
I think it's really a more convenient way to collect wal usage information,
with it we can query when I want. Several points on my side:
1. It will be nice If you provide a chance to reset the information in WalStats,
so that we can reset it without restart the database.
2. I think
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:41 PM Masahiro Ikeda
wrote:
>
> On 2020-10-20 12:46, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:01 AM Masahiro Ikeda
> >> 1. Basic statistics of WAL activity
> >>
> >> - wal_records: Total number of WAL records generated
> >> - wal_fpi: Total number of WAL full
On 2020-10-20 12:46, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:01 AM Masahiro Ikeda
wrote:
Hi,
I think we need to add some statistics to pg_stat_wal view.
Although there are some parameter related WAL,
there are few statistics for tuning them.
I think it's better to provide the
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:01 AM Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think we need to add some statistics to pg_stat_wal view.
>
> Although there are some parameter related WAL,
> there are few statistics for tuning them.
>
> I think it's better to provide the following statistics.
> Please let me
Hi,
I think we need to add some statistics to pg_stat_wal view.
Although there are some parameter related WAL,
there are few statistics for tuning them.
I think it's better to provide the following statistics.
Please let me know your comments.
```
postgres=# SELECT * from pg_stat_wal;
-[
33 matches
Mail list logo
