On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 8:49 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 7:37 PM Ajin Cherian wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:19 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > >
> > > In the commit message, you mentioned: "Performance tests show it's
> > > faster than the COPY (SELECT ...) TO vari
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 7:37 PM Ajin Cherian wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:19 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > In the commit message, you mentioned: "Performance tests show it's
> > faster than the COPY (SELECT ...) TO variant as it avoids the
> > overheads of query processing and sending res
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:19 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> In the commit message, you mentioned: "Performance tests show it's
> faster than the COPY (SELECT ...) TO variant as it avoids the
> overheads of query processing and sending results to the COPY TO
> command.". Can you share the performance da
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 8:39 AM Ajin Cherian wrote:
>
> After patch [1] was committed, the COPY TO command is now supported
> for partitioned tables. This change updates the tablesync logic to use
> COPY TO for partitioned tables as well.
>
In the commit message, you mentioned: "Performance tests
Hi all,
After patch [1] was committed, the COPY TO command is now supported
for partitioned tables. This change updates the tablesync logic to use
COPY TO for partitioned tables as well. This change will only be
invoked when the publication is configured with
publish_via_partition_root = true;
oth
