On 2021-Apr-05, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> In addition to this chain Erik introduced in November within the same thread
> some changes to the chapter "Overview of Query Handling", which subsequently
> was expanded by Heikki and me with the sequence of
> 'arch-dev.sgml.x.diff' files. This is what I
On 2021-Apr-04, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> The small patch 'arch-dev.sgml.20210121.diff' contains only some clearing up
> concerning the used terminology and its alignments with the glossary. The
> patch was rejected by Heikki.
This comment is not helpful, because it's not obvious where would I find
t
On 03.04.21 21:01, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2021-Apr-03, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
On 03.04.21 15:39, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Yes, there is. AFAICS Heikki committed a small wordsmithing patch --
not the large patch with the additional chapter.
What can i do to move the matter forward?
Please post a
On 2021-Apr-03, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> On 03.04.21 15:39, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Yes, there is. AFAICS Heikki committed a small wordsmithing patch --
> > not the large patch with the additional chapter.
>
> What can i do to move the matter forward?
Please post a version that applies to the cu
On 03.04.21 15:39, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Yes, there is. AFAICS Heikki committed a small wordsmithing patch --
not the large patch with the additional chapter.
What can i do to move the matter forward?
--
J. Purtz
On 2021-Mar-25, David Steele wrote:
> On 1/22/21 4:15 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > On 21/01/2021 14:38, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> > > This supervisor process is called > > linkend="glossary-postmaster">postmaster and listens at
> > > a specified TCP/IP port for incoming connections. Whenever he
On 1/22/21 4:15 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 21/01/2021 14:38, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
This supervisor process is called postmaster and listens at
a specified TCP/IP port for incoming connections. Whenever he
detects a request for a connection, he spawns a new backend process.
It sounds weird
On 21/01/2021 14:38, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
This supervisor process is called postmaster and listens at
a specified TCP/IP port for incoming connections. Whenever he
detects a request for a connection, he spawns a new backend process.
It sounds weird to refer to a process with "he". I left out thi
On 18.01.21 15:13, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 20/11/2020 23:52, Erik Rijkers wrote:
(smallish) Changes to arch-dev.sgml
This looks good to me. One little complaint:
@@ -125,7 +122,7 @@
use a supervisor process (also
master process) that spawns a new
server process every time
supervisor process is called postmaster
and ...
like it did before we renamed the binary.
Barring objections, I'll commit this with that change (as attached).
- Heikki
I fear that the patch 'Additional chapter for Tutorial' grows beyond
manageable limits. It runs since nearly one
On 20/11/2020 23:52, Erik Rijkers wrote:
(smallish) Changes to arch-dev.sgml
This looks good to me. One little complaint:
@@ -125,7 +122,7 @@
use a supervisor process (also
master process) that spawns a new
server process every time a connection is requested. This supervisor
-
On 2020-11-15 19:45, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
(smallish) Changes to arch-dev.sgml
Erik
--- ./doc/src/sgml/arch-dev.sgml.orig 2020-11-20 19:14:21.576775798 +0100
+++ ./doc/src/sgml/arch-dev.sgml 2020-11-20 21:43:10.435370787 +0100
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Author
This chapter originated as part
On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 8:56 AM Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> Good catches. Everything applied.
>
MVCC Section
The first paragraph and example in the MVCC section is a good example but
seems misplaced - its relationship to MVCC generally is tenuous, rather I
would expect a discussion of the serializable
On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 8:56 AM Jürgen Purtz wrote:
>
> Good catches. Everything applied.
>
Reviewed the first three sections.
template0 - I would remove the schema portions of this and simply note this
as being a pristine recovery database in the diagram.
I would drop the word "more" and just
On 2020-11-07 13:24, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
Because there have been no more comments in the last days I created a
consolidated patch. It contains Erik's suggestion and some tweaks for
the text size within graphics.
[0011-architecture.patch]
Hi,
I went through architecture.sgml once more; some
On 2020-11-02 09:26, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
OLD:
A first approach to implement protections against concurrent
access to the same data may be the locking of critical
rows. Two such techniques are:
Optimistic Concurrency Control (OCC)
and Two Phase Locking (2PL).
PostgreSQL i
On 02.11.20 07:15, Erik Rijkers wrote:
On 2020-11-01 16:38, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
On 30.10.20 17:45, Erik Rijkers wrote:
And I wrote down some separate items:
1.
'Two Phase Locking' and 'TPL' should be, I think,
'Two-Phase Commit'. Please someone confirm.
(no changes made)
Erik Rijkers
All s
On 2020-11-01 16:38, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
On 30.10.20 17:45, Erik Rijkers wrote:
And I wrote down some separate items:
1.
'Two Phase Locking' and 'TPL' should be, I think,
'Two-Phase Commit'. Please someone confirm.
(no changes made)
Erik Rijkers
All suggestions so far are summarized in the
a somewhat strange word most of the time just 'access' may
> be better. Not sure - native speaker wanted. (no changes made)
You're right, and I included that part.
--
Justin
>From 25cbdab1a1266861c23062501f7e2b9efd2675e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erik Rijkers
Date: Fr
On 2020-10-30 11:57, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
On 26.10.20 15:53, David G. Johnston wrote:
Removing -docs as moderation won’t let me cross-post.
Hi,
I applied 0009-architecture-vs-master.patch to head
and went through architecture.sgml (only that file),
then produced the attached .diff
And I wro
Removing -docs as moderation won’t let me cross-post.
On Monday, October 26, 2020, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Monday, October 26, 2020, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
>
>> On 21.10.20 22:33, David G. Johnston wrote:
>>
>>
>> Two, I find the amount of detail being provided here to be on the
>> too-much
21 matches
Mail list logo
